[PATCH 0/3] argument parsing additions

diff --git a/cc/ce7612d8d4824fbe689bf04864a3524349ffb5 b/cc/ce7612d8d4824fbe689bf04864a3524349ffb5
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..822d52a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/cc/ce7612d8d4824fbe689bf04864a3524349ffb5
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CC1431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  9 Mar 2012 14:33:38 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id AVFxqTwSh3MT for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri,  9 Mar 2012 14:33:38 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA794431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  9 Mar 2012 14:33:37 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so2252374lah.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:33:34 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:x-mailer:in-reply-to:references\r
+       :x-gm-message-state;\r
+       bh=6O1OFY0g/SBOQFGOj1o/3/GqLK9X2j6EZ8mhFboZO44=;\r
+       b=kBKfSVm+XOvod37geb1osQTzix3U2pdmwMOfCrkWUorympEgFj3MNov25E5pRJ1KpD\r
+       QiaYYGoTpeCEHnJVTK/bfORDUDPbZzmFl+dI+IG/xtuJejk65ktPSbof11fTRAFmqmnU\r
+       1+HU93r6/sFTVPUa381hUXArhZdbq6AcyLr4dB1fj54t88dqn2q3D+vRm/dzn+xZhUAw\r
+       UzIpNmxokyVO3Ue1xuUW3Gt7syGefWUxjK/9qCHrOoqMMKdlTEGnZZixnoxcfyG/ul7v\r
+       NQbkINNrFfaBOmBfTjn5vvLPIZU0oMWWKa2QVxS6u2oWm0ZMfxzqvx2vVKJACqnqO45D\r
+       cdaQ==\r
+Received: by 10.112.36.71 with SMTP id o7mr882007lbj.3.1331332414729;\r
+       Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:33:34 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe50f800-253.dhcp.inet.fi.\r
+       [84.248.80.253])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k10sm8024202lbu.1.2012.03.09.14.33.32\r
+       (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:33:33 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org,\r
+       markwalters1009@gmail.com\r
+Subject: [PATCH 0/3] argument parsing additions\r
+Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:33:27 +0200\r
+Message-Id: <cover.1331329406.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.5.4\r
+In-Reply-To: <87399iicit.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+References: <87399iicit.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQk2QDxxdRAWpx/NnkCSodP7a3iecOz1B7kQuMiip7tO8LjoSMbz4tqlAi/FVbawhvwPWv1D\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:33:38 -0000\r
+\r
+Hi Mark -\r
+\r
+I'm not sure which is worse, criticizing or rewriting other people's\r
+patches. I already did the former, and now I'm doing the\r
+latter. Apologies for both. I didn't really mean to write these patches,\r
+but it turned out to be more fun writing a proper reply in C than in\r
+English.\r
+\r
+Patch 1 adds --arg=true and --arg=false support for booleans. It's not\r
+strictly required for the --entire-thread support in patch 3, which uses\r
+the extension of keyword arguments from patch 2, but it's for\r
+consistency across boolean arguments.\r
+\r
+Please let me know what you think.\r
+\r
+BR,\r
+Jani.\r
+\r
+\r
+Jani Nikula (3):\r
+  command-line-arguments: allow true and false keywords for booleans\r
+  command-line-arguments: support keyword arguments with default value\r
+  cli: allow switching off entire thread mode in notmuch show json\r
+    format\r
+\r
+ command-line-arguments.c |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------\r
+ command-line-arguments.h |    1 +\r
+ notmuch-show.c           |   12 ++++++++++--\r
+ 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)\r
+\r
+-- \r
+1.7.5.4\r
+\r