--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC1B431FBD\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 17:07:52 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+ FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id qgHu2+Cpxj8M for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sat, 2 Mar 2013 17:07:52 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com (mail-pb0-f45.google.com\r
+ [209.85.160.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01F99431FAF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 17:07:51 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ro8so2432653pbb.18\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:07:51 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=x-received:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to\r
+ :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition\r
+ :content-transfer-encoding;\r
+ bh=Yw6jyLo4T2qD9BVoK5vTGA7MbZRztmxMk/xN4JbaQhc=;\r
+ b=uVXkRGa3fw0MlQtFGHhbUE43WFbtGoesRYX3bq2MeeL6Ilde9Bwyw+Dv9oby2iW0mc\r
+ 4Hjq5Ohb8p592zdotM7HzQ15fA9WqT0KveT0hR603fRvdx2xZB75w6Rqodo93Ty+WRMP\r
+ awVxOkVd1Z6U+lS5P6PVjo1mac8N21eIFPWNV2Wsz+qRbmsPry7PMuFQGM0ivI/Bodg7\r
+ npRvol6pISOEDxowm/FauztuvbaZh0Lnebloc/AycmHzEiRlCz9qaIF5YP7MHKOkkCaP\r
+ ZPL3UGeyjz08EMpv2xM5FazJ2mv/L7+GB04tj52NrxGeBq1XjKcCsWuEsESkFV6ZGkW3\r
+ d4tg==\r
+X-Received: by 10.66.4.193 with SMTP id m1mr25243093pam.214.1362272871134;\r
+ Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:07:51 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.\r
+ [220.233.42.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id\r
+ rr14sm17045838pbb.34.2013.03.02.17.07.48\r
+ (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);\r
+ Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:07:49 -0800 (PST)\r
+Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:07:45 +1100\r
+Message-ID: <20130303120745.GA4884@hili.localdomain>\r
+From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] cli: support Mail-Followup-To: in notmuch reply\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <f9c7258be72bec0b174553db0410c29eba2745fa.1362254104.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+References:\r
+ <5eaa3acc22ee5513bdce5ab931b7a79ade880e06.1362254104.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+ <f9c7258be72bec0b174553db0410c29eba2745fa.1362254104.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 01:07:52 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 21:55:21 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+> Use Mail-Followup-To header to determine recipients according to\r
+> http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html if configured and present in the\r
+> message being replied to.\r
+\r
+I would like to see an option to --reply-to=list that, as far as\r
+possible, does the right thing. If we had that, do we need\r
+reply.honor_followup_to?\r
+\r
+Peter\r