Re: plans for 0.12

diff --git a/35/b2d93f80a37dfa563320dff83b5bbff123ee2b b/35/b2d93f80a37dfa563320dff83b5bbff123ee2b
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..176a11b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35/b2d93f80a37dfa563320dff83b5bbff123ee2b
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70195431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  1 Mar 2012 14:43:58 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id QeZ1SXLO9AmF for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu,  1 Mar 2012 14:43:57 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1B34431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  1 Mar 2012 14:43:57 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fctnnbsc30w-142166230117.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       ([142.166.230.117] helo=zancas.localnet)\r
+       by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)\r
+       (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1S3Ej6-0007h7-0u; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:43:56 -0400\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1S3Ej0-0004Vb-MQ; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:43:50 -0400\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: plans for 0.12\r
+In-Reply-To: <877gz4dnl2.fsf@praet.org>\r
+References: <87mx87j8eh.fsf@zancas.localnet> <877gz4dnl2.fsf@praet.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+263~g4fa77d0 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:43:50 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <8762eo2b89.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Spam_bar: -\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:43:58 -0000\r
+\r
+On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:21:29 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:\r
+> \r
+> Some of the features added/refactored post-0.11.1 don't have any\r
+> test coverage yet.  Should they, before wrapping up 0.12 ?\r
+> (not a rhetorical question, I'm genuinely asking for opinions)\r
+> \r
+\r
+Hi Pieter;\r
+\r
+My initial answer is probably not. I see the tests as mainly useful\r
+during development, for detecting regressions. I think most people doing\r
+development will be working from git, rather than the distribution\r
+tarballs we ship.   \r
+\r
+On the other hand, adding tests is also not that risky, so if the\r
+concensus is strongly in favour of integrating them pre 0.12, and\r
+somebody wants to review them all, then I'm willing to consider it.\r
+\r
+d\r