--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9830431FC4\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:28:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.699\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id pSlqEDsZ2KRY for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:28:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com\r
+ [209.85.214.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD5BB431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:28:53 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by obbup19 with SMTP id up19so2984847obb.26\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:28:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
+ :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;\r
+ bh=xmmT4CXQhcleJBmMLpE0Dcu6OcvldGsOBuybj/sQlek=;\r
+ b=Jpu90pKwq+ArJJZoQkSnOakI3udz8lKfBNKcYn/HnQ70vn+ZNUpOWEokRkhbRb4ZSV\r
+ DuKOgSohefqysSCJUmjWuadZlmpHdTHSIs4DimzkyOrHIOJ+G4hj/806g/A6mQ4Rst+L\r
+ /5XAIzo797HNajX7UHgOfl88NZ/LNzQtupanS+MgEguxlw0qDL6kvH31mbQVoUf+SN3C\r
+ UgHnhe3xpONgoKUH0UEjmrHQRAeA0osSHafOxg2qFiIhGQY0w4qo8rfsMwk8DIE9EHB2\r
+ vFiz7fhhXINEZIdF+IU1Rd+oqs2bM4PDOnWSNA441KvqrAq+tS9/tOoAzKBUyHovbZjm\r
+ EX0w==\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.60.19.42 with SMTP id b10mr1101010oee.12.1340872132177; Thu,\r
+ 28 Jun 2012 01:28:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by 10.76.10.102 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:28:51 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by 10.76.10.102 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:28:51 -0700 (PDT)\r
+In-Reply-To: <87hatwqoz9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+References: <1340815565-21083-1-git-send-email-cworth@cworth.org>\r
+ <87obo4zljq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+ <87hatwqoz9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:28:51 +0300\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAB+hUn9_VW9P4rTXV8QjgTLDdN23NDrfOtJydQrS80RjES+wNg@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all)\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb206e820afae04c3841f23\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQlIMGFbi1seYbpS8pwZULVAp/EmoakoQIPK022ttix4lyTl08oMQJ1WQvzM0zn9Q3lL/rjV\r
+Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:28:54 -0000\r
+\r
+--e89a8fb206e820afae04c3841f23\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+\r
+On Jun 28, 2012 3:06 AM, "David Bremner" <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> > On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
+> > > This restores the original keybinding and uses the new keybinding for\r
+> > > the new feature.\r
+>\r
+> My bias is probably apparent in that I pushed the original patch...\r
+\r
+And mine in that I sent the original patch. And that's pretty much the only\r
+reason for me to not steer clear of this discussion. I'll just say I'm not\r
+opposed to changing back.\r
+\r
+> Anyway, if there is consensus that changing back is the right thing to\r
+> do, then I can live with that.\r
+\r
+Me too.\r
+\r
+BR,\r
+Jani.\r
+\r
+--e89a8fb206e820afae04c3841f23\r
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8\r
+\r
+<p><br>\r
+On Jun 28, 2012 3:06 AM, "David Bremner" <<a href="mailto:david@tethera.net">david@tethera.net</a>> wrote:<br>\r
+> > On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth <<a href="mailto:cworth@cworth.org">cworth@cworth.org</a>> wrote:<br>\r
+> > > This restores the original keybinding and uses the new keybinding for<br>\r
+> > > the new feature.<br>\r
+><br>\r
+> My bias is probably apparent in that I pushed the original patch...</p>\r
+<p>And mine in that I sent the original patch. And that's pretty much the only reason for me to not steer clear of this discussion. I'll just say I'm not opposed to changing back.</p>\r
+<p>> Anyway, if there is consensus that changing back is the right thing to<br>\r
+> do, then I can live with that.</p>\r
+<p>Me too.<br></p>\r
+<p>BR,<br>\r
+Jani.<br>\r
+</p>\r
+\r
+--e89a8fb206e820afae04c3841f23--\r