--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E2A431FAF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 10:24:49 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+ NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id yyg1xyuekjZ8 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 15 Apr 2012 10:24:48 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7960431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 10:24:48 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+ by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1SJTBu-0006sr-Ie; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:24:46 +0100\r
+Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]\r
+ helo=localhost)\r
+ by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1SJTBu-0002yE-A3; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:24:46 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+ Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] emacs: modify help message for\r
+ notmuch-search-line-faces to reflect preferred "deleted" tag name.\r
+In-Reply-To: <1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+References: <87vcoaywyu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+ <1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+110~gbc97b4a (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:25:05 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87iph06h72.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: be5355f3ddbe189c75273f9b8033090c (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+ determine if it is\r
+ spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+ This message scored -1.8 points.\r
+ Summary of the scoring: \r
+ * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+ * medium trust\r
+ * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+ * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+ provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+ * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay\r
+ * domain\r
+ * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:24:49 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+> No functional change here. The help message previously referred to\r
+> the "delete" tag, but "deleted" is now preferred, so hopefully this\r
+> will reduce any potential confusion.\r
+\r
+This patch is trivially correct regardless of the rest of the\r
+series. \r
+\r
+I think the rest of the series (which provides keybindings for\r
+adding/removing the delete tag to messages/threads) is worthwhile\r
+particularly now the exclude stuff is fairly complete (feedback at the\r
+time looked positive).\r
+\r
+Patch 2/3 needs simple but genuine rebasing as the names of the\r
+tagging functions have changed though. \r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+> ---\r
+> emacs/notmuch.el | 4 ++--\r
+> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)\r
+>\r
+> diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el\r
+> index e4bca51..67ecd3a 100644\r
+> --- a/emacs/notmuch.el\r
+> +++ b/emacs/notmuch.el\r
+> @@ -660,12 +660,12 @@ This function advances the next thread when finished."\r
+> Here is an example of how to color search results based on tags.\r
+> (the following text would be placed in your ~/.emacs file):\r
+> \r
+> - (setq notmuch-search-line-faces '((\"delete\" . (:foreground \"red\"\r
+> + (setq notmuch-search-line-faces '((\"deleted\" . (:foreground \"red\"\r
+> :background \"blue\"))\r
+> (\"unread\" . (:foreground \"green\"))))\r
+> \r
+> The attributes defined for matching tags are merged, with later\r
+> -attributes overriding earlier. A message having both \"delete\"\r
+> +attributes overriding earlier. A message having both \"deleted\"\r
+> and \"unread\" tags with the above settings would have a green\r
+> foreground and blue background."\r
+> :type '(alist :key-type (string) :value-type (custom-face-edit))\r
+> -- \r
+> 1.7.7.3\r
+>\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r