--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <greenfreedom10@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D544E4041DA\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 14:37:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.201\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+ FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id KyXCMPcr4Ake for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Mon, 9 Apr 2012 14:37:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E3374041D4\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 14:37:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by werm13 with SMTP id m13so3459479wer.26\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:37:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references\r
+ :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to\r
+ :content-language:user-agent;\r
+ bh=JoeWwk99T38xQ6eJYlC12pmnnFWw3sx9kZCwDrtaOtE=;\r
+ b=x/D4AV9InVzxY1d5ogt6Lq/5S6nxCS5ZLYyoHEw3/qGMBKEE3p+fp1LLlfwTVtDhq7\r
+ IMUxaRacygOtEaZLtGpeYCZIvbu6Vq1P0PT8GkPzz2cMWgiVhyOCWzlf8c1bbHsfDVxi\r
+ J+TFEQZ88qcNvVBthB5QwNerBtSpkcUtLukqLrmUQwnq0lsMu6JVMVxPHH4Ne5+F6sTJ\r
+ EjPc1jI6ZI2PD4A6uDb5hS0qtmDUj1cp3Rld9sr5FtpJEwIS/rIZXRO8M/CxpZsCNW7g\r
+ zmx9qfWtvNXc80tzhd/nWfYR8kCmREW4ntFyq+5ClCCuGX9xrSPb8/WVJ8u92PXyo4TH\r
+ cEoA==\r
+Received: by 10.180.103.35 with SMTP id ft3mr1277467wib.0.1334007430666;\r
+ Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:37:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (ip-66-241-175-42.cmts-dhcp.way.huntel.net.\r
+ [66.241.175.42])\r
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w10sm53523797wiy.3.2012.04.09.14.37.05\r
+ (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+ Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:37:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 16:36:45 -0500\r
+From: green <greenfreedom10@gmail.com>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Message deletion wisdom\r
+Message-ID: <20120409213645.GQ3581@swansys>\r
+Mail-Followup-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+References: <0cc49af3-5415-419d-97ef-2bec76117d63@CERNFE22.cern.ch>\r
+ <87sjgk2xzf.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+ <87k41ucfqc.fsf@marcos.anarcat.ath.cx>\r
+ <3wdobr4vclt.fsf@testarossa.amd.com>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;\r
+ protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW"\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+In-Reply-To: <3wdobr4vclt.fsf@testarossa.amd.com>\r
+Content-Language: en\r
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:37:14 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+--b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+Mark Anderson wrote at 2012-04-06 15:17 -0500:\r
+> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:20:43 -0400, Antoine Beaupr=C3=A9 <anarcat@anarcat.=\r
+ath.cx> wrote:\r
+> > Finally, I want to voice that I feel a "delete" key, even if it doesn't\r
+> > delete mails, seems like an important part of a mail user\r
+> > agent. Archiving mail is one thing, but for the love and respect of\r
+> > sysadmins and the infrastructure they maintain, please consider adding\r
+> > at least a way to *tag* those deleted emails.\r
+> >=20\r
+> > Having the above keys being defined as standard in notmuch don't seem\r
+> > like much to ask.\r
+> >=20\r
+> > This may be a dissenting view here, but your mail is not that\r
+> > important. :P\r
+>=20\r
+> Hear! Hear!\r
+\r
+I agree also. I receive lots of mail that I never want to see again, nor d=\r
+o=20\r
+I want to see it still existing anywhere in my /home/user or in my backups.=\r
+ =20\r
+Someone might argue "but what if you decide you want it later" but I can us=\r
+e=20\r
+an Expires header to mark a message like "delete in 2 months", so I still=\r
+=20\r
+have a chance to retrieve it within an amount of time I choose.\r
+\r
+Somewhat related is the concept of saving spam messages. I can understand=\r
+=20\r
+the reasoning behind training bayesian filters, but I have never kept spam.=\r
+ =20\r
+I switched to bogofilter recently, and it was correctly filtering mail very=\r
+=20\r
+quickly, perhaps within a few weeks (I did train it using non-spam messages=\r
+).\r
+\r
+--b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"\r
+Content-Description: Digital signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAk+DVmwACgkQ682C+dBP+oQOlgCgsJuzNi3YLD5dE66D6ildrUNs\r
+6UIAn22pctj1mXCpLaOA29cIcui8qZGd\r
+=Gb9g\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+\r
+--b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW--\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / commitdiff