Re: [PATCH 0/8] Rewrite JSON show format

diff --git a/5e/ffb23dbe9f1c5dc38d594d0b19df1b8cfeb059 b/5e/ffb23dbe9f1c5dc38d594d0b19df1b8cfeb059
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..6b84f90
--- /dev/null
+++ b/5e/ffb23dbe9f1c5dc38d594d0b19df1b8cfeb059
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+Return-Path: <awg@xvx.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F47429E30\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:20:39 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id D0aCccaSWMVf for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:20:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09A32429E26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:20:34 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by lahd3 with SMTP id d3so1161781lah.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:20:32 -0800 (PST)\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.152.128.230 with SMTP id nr6mr15798260lab.27.1329319231965;\r
+       Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:20:31 -0800 (PST)\r
+Sender: awg@xvx.ca\r
+Received: by 10.112.90.20 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:20:31 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Originating-IP: [96.52.216.56]\r
+In-Reply-To: <m2obt0dtv8.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+References: <1329240823-7856-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
+       <m2obt0dtv8.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:20:31 -0700\r
+X-Google-Sender-Auth: ILx-RWHKfzUjOtNR4DXFrVpjM50\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAMoJFUughkKcQhm3KqcLvrti1ijdQj1qWSPkgWxwYcNrexeysQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Rewrite JSON show format\r
+From: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQn4MJ9V7VGUgtNCxGmdOlKDQQFxOloV5msIzShaSLZXofmVs3L4ZU0FMiA6oQ84F1/BfKEX\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:20:39 -0000\r
+\r
+On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:00, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:\r
+> Most json-related tests pass (for me), but I get this:\r
+>\r
+> =A0FAIL =A0 notmuch-show for message with invalid From\r
+> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0--- emacs.10.expected =A0 2012-02-15 14:28:48.000000000 +0=\r
+000\r
+> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0+++ emacs.10.output =A0 =A0 2012-02-15 14:28:48.000000000 =\r
++0000\r
+> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@\r
+> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-"Invalid " (2001-01-05) (inbox)\r
+> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0+Invalid =A0From <test_suite@notmuchmail.org> <q> (2001-01=\r
+-05) (inbox)\r
+>\r
+> If this works for others then the problem is in my setup\r
+> (I have 8 other tests failing for various other reasons)\r
+\r
+This one works for me, but the expected output in my version looks\r
+like: "Invalid " (2001-01-05) (inbox). It looks like that test changed\r
+in part 4 of this series, so maybe something didn't apply properly on\r
+your tree?\r