--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C168431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:27:49 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 2.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: **\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+ FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+ FREEMAIL_REPLY=2.499, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id r9T9CHLIc9JJ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:27:49 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C237F431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:27:48 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id t11so2167249wey.26\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:27:47 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:x-mailer;\r
+ bh=SG4hZ0hZwBFuNPS0upXq+6Xx0/ioL7bO+x4Up5/EYR0=;\r
+ b=XELsbyup+11xVL2sapRPnq1FbUilOimJ5mnFteepDAdgSG6a8dlrhiWBsknbxMwNQU\r
+ wcsc42ZyFdAHOgrnT8Z3OMHGRoMGKvx3CshmiV4DznK2KxdrIM5FZD4KEIOQ8fC/AKNx\r
+ meYVS2G2/iyQNihox7jhT8wMO17vhaax+sz+hFktDhLBUDZO1x+5HdV2eQFPs0bP3kRB\r
+ uuYSvaApBguPHXXO1XbnsW5bkBCURrVjzKjkT70BuQwyFgiqjBUQehf9G7JWmakWwByt\r
+ TgA8n301IFExTVqVQo8IOBNcRkkfhZ+2kG7S5dlvnhagGc92Nfu6jBLz0v1dYJofHxC0\r
+ faag==\r
+Received: by 10.180.88.71 with SMTP id be7mr28124wib.17.1354663666160;\r
+ Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:27:46 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk. [93.97.24.31])\r
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t17sm3999400wiv.6.2012.12.04.15.27.44\r
+ (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+ Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:27:45 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Use invisibility to toggle display of all parts including\r
+ multipart\r
+Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 23:27:39 +0000\r
+Message-Id: <1354663662-20524-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.1\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 23:27:49 -0000\r
+\r
+This patch aims to do the same as\r
+id:1354496317-24564-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com but\r
+rather than reloading the buffer it uses invisibility. \r
+\r
+Most of the invisibility stuff was taken from notmuch-wash and adapted\r
+to this situation.\r
+\r
+The general interface is that any part can have its visibility\r
+toggled: in this version by "t" on the part button. In addition "RET"\r
+on the part button of any "not shown" part will show it.\r
+\r
+Whilst a main driver was being able to view different parts of a\r
+multipart/alternative message, this also allows the user to toggle\r
+images or large inline text attachments (eg text/x-tex) for\r
+example. Indeed, even multipart part buttons can be toggled which\r
+remove the whole tree beneath: it is unclear whether this last is useful.\r
+\r
+The invisibility approach has some advantages over the reloading\r
+approach. It does not disrupt the rest of the buffer (eg\r
+collapsed/expanded citations remain), it does not require an extra\r
+call to the database with the possible addition of messages to the\r
+buffer, and it fits more naturally with the other hidden/not-hidden\r
+items.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+\r
+Mark Walters (3):\r
+ emacs: show: modify insert-part-header to save the button text\r
+ emacs: show: add overlays for each part\r
+ emacs: show: add invisibility button action\r
+\r
+ emacs/notmuch-show.el | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------\r
+ 1 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)\r
+\r
+-- \r
+1.7.9.1\r
+\r