Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: new mua mailto: URI handler

diff --git a/7f/b7a10a3c8a86611d290354dc550f6e6d5efc36 b/7f/b7a10a3c8a86611d290354dc550f6e6d5efc36
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..8aabfb2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/7f/b7a10a3c8a86611d290354dc550f6e6d5efc36
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6F0431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:22:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 50vOMhmw6TV6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:22:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 825C5431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:22:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so3215884lah.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:22:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version\r
+       :content-type:x-gm-message-state;\r
+       bh=wWIPi4nwKECD4fl42eJO0+YmZq2BHxiBMR6YqiHUhvQ=;\r
+       b=n+1VvlTd/Xkn3RZTcjiuV5E/DSRpRz8AWL1bs0/VJ9M+u9RTksByfVGGqt5oPaGimQ\r
+       0IffUeJPwo7CpBtOFa6Ux/h41REkn7pVPJdHFVfIe9dn3mskSmFPhlYh+HeWFGUeVAfT\r
+       fwKIvo6kcvfPK8M1/QKCcZfvr6Re4f+lRsJlPAKvP/Q7QVqspwA8E4fBm+deVlPBh52W\r
+       XvFvxznWpwNblnMilpXgHrLdnWq0CYpa6JSHRks5JVHdzoQIG481ap/tVvcKWKHcjBXq\r
+       Y2Lb9O4E+sBLOZecFTf0M1kioOTUdX1hfUMOxid0+0QNgq/uBBH8mutMlk6pGHkWG5Ky\r
+       kzzw==\r
+Received: by 10.112.103.74 with SMTP id fu10mr2842461lbb.1.1334438539962;\r
+       Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:22:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe50dc00-68.dhcp.inet.fi.\r
+       [80.220.80.68])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w10sm17608524lbe.14.2012.04.14.14.22.17\r
+       (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:22:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: new mua mailto: URI handler\r
+In-Reply-To: <87bomucaq3.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <1327865624-7673-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+       <1327865624-7673-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+       <87hawmyt8k.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87wr5idprb.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+       <87bomucaq3.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>User-Agent:\r
+       Notmuch/0.12+81~g839a805 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:22:15 +0300\r
+Message-ID: <87r4vqdn5k.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQnoFtbcZH89UGettjAdMgPs9MofbIEjef27xOgOsPpBmo5tmO/uXjpJ5vBKgDy5mWLw81ax\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 21:22:22 -0000\r
+\r
+Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> On Sat, Apr 14 2012, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+>> I'm going through the review queue right now, tagging notmuch::stale any\r
+>> patches that don't apply on master. I was just about to nmbug push stale\r
+>> on this one (2/2). Is that in error? Care to verify?\r
+>\r
+> Yes, it is an error.  This patch applies to master.  Did you in fact\r
+> verify that it doesn't?  You should not be tagging patches stale if they\r
+> in fact still apply to master.  If they still need review or something\r
+> else that's a different matter.  Please don't mark things as stale if\r
+> they are not.\r
+\r
+My nmfirehose script flagged the patch as not applying, and I verified\r
+this (and all of them) by hand, using the emacs interface to save the\r
+patch. No, I'm not intentionally tagging patches stale if they apply,\r
+but I'll stop for now in case there's a bug somewhere (incl. PEBKAC)\r
+breaking the patches and thus making them not apply.\r
+\r
+> Obviously I still care about this patch, or I wouldn't have re-commented\r
+> on it.\r
+\r
+I was doing this purely based on whether the patches apply or not.\r
+\r
+\r
+BR,\r
+Jani.\r