Re: search summary and exclusions

diff --git a/8a/3de6f17c5134c97c4ab814bee96461595b41c7 b/8a/3de6f17c5134c97c4ab814bee96461595b41c7
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..156e8f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/8a/3de6f17c5134c97c4ab814bee96461595b41c7
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F264C431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:22:37 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 6OLuAdg8QXxT for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:22:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F052431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:22:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1Sg9of-0008Nd-O5; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:22:33 +0100\r
+Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]\r
+       helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1Sg9of-0006oc-Ch; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:22:33 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: search summary and exclusions\r
+In-Reply-To: <20120617170325.GA18059@hili.localdomain>\r
+References: <20120529000012.GF2331@hili.localdomain>\r
+       <87mx4sp79z.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <20120529140107.GE2347@hili.localdomain>\r
+       <87fwajnibz.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <20120530130733.GC2332@hili.localdomain>\r
+       <878vgam7lg.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+       <20120617170325.GA18059@hili.localdomain>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+63~g548a9bf (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:22:30 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87zk82l7wp.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 8550063a1a89af19f0afbef57a432d43 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored -1.8 points.\r
+       Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+       *      medium trust\r
+       *      [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay\r
+       *      domain\r
+       *  0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 07:22:38 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+On Sun, 17 Jun 2012, Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> On Wed, 30 May 2012 08:49:31 +0100, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+>> \r
+>> On Wed, 30 May 2012, Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+>> >\r
+>> > Maybe there is room for another keyword under --exclude?\r
+>> \r
+>> Yes that might be the best way to go. Something like --exclude=all and\r
+>> then excluded messages never appear anywhere?\r
+>> \r
+>> I think it should be easy: I will try to send a patch tonight.\r
+>\r
+> Hi Mark,\r
+>\r
+> Did you get a chance to try this?  Otherwise I can have a look.\r
+\r
+Hi sorry I did try this but got distracted. Doing it neatly turned out\r
+to be a bit bigger than I expected. I will post what I had as a reply to\r
+this message, but I don't think I will be able to work on it any time\r
+soon so feel free to take it over.\r
+\r
+I think it all works but I have not tested it very much.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r