Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] Reply improvements

diff --git a/47/4c597945f70dc8d94c036f7e9926e20e388394 b/47/4c597945f70dc8d94c036f7e9926e20e388394
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..14c6e46
--- /dev/null
+++ b/47/4c597945f70dc8d94c036f7e9926e20e388394
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+Return-Path: <awg@xvx.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A931431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:09:28 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id lu+Ty7r2YVLd for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:09:27 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 534AE431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:09:27 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by lahd3 with SMTP id d3so4339058lah.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:09:25 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of awg@xvx.ca designates 10.112.49.135\r
+       as permitted sender) client-ip=10.112.49.135; \r
+Authentication-Results: mr.google.com;\r
+       spf=pass (google.com: domain of awg@xvx.ca designates\r
+       10.112.49.135 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=awg@xvx.ca\r
+Received: from mr.google.com ([10.112.49.135])\r
+       by 10.112.49.135 with SMTP id u7mr3481786lbn.86.1330229365720 (num_hops\r
+       = 1); Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:09:25 -0800 (PST)\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.112.49.135 with SMTP id u7mr2646425lbn.86.1330208709973; Sat,\r
+       25 Feb 2012 14:25:09 -0800 (PST)\r
+Sender: awg@xvx.ca\r
+Received: by 10.152.127.67 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 14:25:09 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Originating-IP: [96.52.216.56]\r
+In-Reply-To: <87ty2e4n6r.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <1329893199-21630-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+       <87ty2e4n6r.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:25:09 -0700\r
+X-Google-Sender-Auth: HNXCPSvzP8S1e2JI7lGum9QhssY\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAMoJFUuhqwjSZpW2uaHsC+5H_VmAF0TewtLJ-H6jfTWWLsM6fA@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] Reply improvements\r
+From: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQm73i1nWAE/4v1BtYujSo8c576UanohyIFPPqPUru5wmlv0i2Kv/At+H0XeKYg5jM93FP8w\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 04:09:28 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 14:29, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> By coincidence I "unpromoted it", perhaps because I was missing\r
+> context. It seemed strange to push one patch from the middle of the\r
+> series.\r
+\r
+I think that part was promoted by Austin because one of his\r
+otherwise-ready patches relies on it, and it doesn't change any\r
+functionality.\r
+\r
+Austin, can you confirm this?\r