Re: search summary and exclusions
authorJameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Wed, 30 May 2012 03:58:08 +0000 (20:58 +1700)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:47:30 +0000 (09:47 -0800)
7a/e88cd8cc955e99462133552e6f3d23a20f1b7b [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/7a/e88cd8cc955e99462133552e6f3d23a20f1b7b b/7a/e88cd8cc955e99462133552e6f3d23a20f1b7b
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..f3ec05f
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651CF431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 29 May 2012 20:58:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id OfHVAwcMezOY for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 29 May 2012 20:58:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FED8431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 29 May 2012 20:58:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AB166E00BD;\r
+       Tue, 29 May 2012 20:58:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (unknown [76.89.192.57])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E45F66E00AD;\r
+       Tue, 29 May 2012 20:58:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 23FF8ADA; Tue, 29 May 2012 20:58:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: search summary and exclusions\r
+In-Reply-To: <20120530130733.GC2332@hili.localdomain>\r
+References: <20120529000012.GF2331@hili.localdomain>\r
+       <87mx4sp79z.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <20120529140107.GE2347@hili.localdomain>\r
+       <87fwajnibz.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <20120530130733.GC2332@hili.localdomain>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13+24~g16915cd (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 20:58:08 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87wr3uxqun.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 03:58:15 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Tue, May 29 2012, Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> --output=summary is the default.  --format=json only changes the\r
+> surface syntax.\r
+\r
+I'm sorry.  For some reason this whole time I was thinking --format=text\r
+when you were saying --output=summary.  My bad.\r
+\r
+> Understood; it's a two-phase process, and I wasn't making the\r
+> distinction.  If it is the expected and useful behaviour, so be it.\r
+>\r
+> Maybe there is room for another keyword under --exclude?\r
+\r
+Maybe.  As always, patches welcome!\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPxZrQAAoJEO00zqvie6q8C4sQALeOplXTOEGPpxNXf5p3n5Ir\r
+AjNIGCE301RNiHDZouVHTVex2ezkMxcM0sR+jBltazG6nmUe5Nh1236CERCJmX3H\r
+gmVOz7nhYFaeEI18qmT1MtQ++DL8eUayPYGjxdByzU/rRdKUWAtU6WFJ1/vFWm5p\r
+L2mXN4IDrxJi67LsroT0saublhEYiNFZ8iUDw5GEe78CApRo/IFTcmgrG/8MMr4F\r
+YRO1NdBpJQE+klojalaFlCsrE0MZ/AROD81sdaFtCuKja9+LWqFQ+4iW/o0U6jW2\r
+rvRcjO2KAcKwzJkT/4DG/TmwakZX5R2clcQYZZOcvitZJilWu04vP0EWuR9bV6+s\r
+sXKmHLqtReo0NeeEfHPrkh+A4pigXj60B2LB7KP7/yf7/jCn44IEid2wJKX+/xH7\r
+E3qUkQrwdCsc1R6XjxBh3h4PDaUjWCd9ZA5MpVEEhKoKP37gklBiNvpe3yjKri8r\r
+v/sREhlatuS+ZNPGIm0wrBVuR4zJ58iZr9x4ZKU2JW37QyuEVq/oxiiI//Ccofk1\r
+/IycqVXKpyKk6ik3X/86dArIqqX5zPUzSp4cli9dCy84vB03Ax26F+Rq0ZkUVZre\r
+0hzgVUqYk92yPDcA1QhVJpTn6x2tuotUkA4ntGaEwCBW4YLcPGk7nj/YlQawimFk\r
+SbjYEsoalGPhav3Egvit\r
+=2WQe\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r