--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <daniel@schoepe.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BAE5429E45\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:29:08 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.8\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id LJCX03u-tmHs for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:29:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com\r
+ [74.125.83.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client\r
+ certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
+ 3F50E429E42 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:29:04 -0800\r
+ (PST)\r
+Received: by eeke51 with SMTP id e51so1557985eek.26\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:29:01 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=schoepe.org; s=google;\r
+ h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id\r
+ :mime-version:content-type;\r
+ bh=7GDSw0oFFT+VR7QMMaAB3BkTVBg51v7P/dcQwYGSfqQ=;\r
+ b=QWZxxwZGvxcr/mevKKuKRQzoZTKExmNFY1lN0zWe2I2EOlCslhOwZelKywf62vuQfO\r
+ +T/5eFQFF9Dli/jCr8BcWeLlvIDc9qfwJDC9+7DGZofUx4YUehlehwOYcZMtlxjlGGrc\r
+ yV30EAS3hqNDzFptzh1gYUxFCaBLA7MYTzjy8=\r
+Received: by 10.14.124.211 with SMTP id x59mr2822783eeh.51.1329442141088;\r
+ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:29:01 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (p4FC79069.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.199.144.105])\r
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n56sm32481320eeh.6.2012.02.16.17.28.58\r
+ (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:28:59 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Daniel Schoepe <daniel@schoepe.org>\r
+To: Philippe LeCavalier <support@plecavalier.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: nomuch_addresses.py\r
+In-Reply-To: <87r4xur3rv.fsf@plc.plecavalier.com>\r
+References: <87r4xur3rv.fsf@plc.plecavalier.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+198~g2043a63 (http://notmuchmail.org)\r
+ Emacs/24.0.93.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 02:28:52 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87fweamenf.fsf@schoepe.localhost>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+ micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQm45dUVFyFQhKmLgmPhWUyiN3kseiQGb4Ev0z5pAPJ6EqbV9EQa9KJEP3503kCLY2c2m+ET\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:29:08 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:12:36 -0500, Philippe LeCavalier <support@plecavalie=\r
+r.com> wrote:\r
+> Hi again.\r
+>=20\r
+> I'm trying to setup tab completion for addresses. I appeared to me that\r
+> the simplest solution was notmuch_addresses so I grabbed a copy from\r
+> git. When I hit tab I get this[1] Was I suppose to do something more?\r
+\r
+Just for completeness: I'm using the nice nottoomuch-addresses.pl script\r
+[1] by Tomi Ollila which doesn't require any bindings and is incredibly\r
+fast (after generating an initial address database).\r
+\r
+Disclaimer: I never tried the python script, so I can't really give a\r
+useful comparison.\r
+\r
+[1] id:"m2d3c8e22v.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi"\r
+\r
+Cheers,\r
+Daniel\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPPa1UAAoJEIaTAtce+Z+JiAcP/3QjnmyWnmCZoddKpPWw8OuW\r
+8pbAiuKrbwIyMzYFigNBMdBgR6DzM6HfdRRNS+TZpyEg7LKqei1Ip8rz6dviCzMU\r
+DbvSAIYUbjeV8L2auTELurcs1GPbTP2qGJqbM4tb7wF+uAdKm5if30mLvmMs/DQI\r
+cCXRjTrbyQgPOzqXXqHdTIuEiZ+YmOSM6/2Owu8wNMNh8yMo5Z0wnUDTTkRoKeLk\r
+2ASyRqTC4IMnzrJiHet6NZfrC9I9PL61VW+lBArTww5+2rQ4w5G7CbpR5LKewtmh\r
+iEeyTPc3DqxMe6Zn0N86o1AcmqR5tSj7b1xf9Yd74dWwk2tqPwBxpBlawNDkHivL\r
+3iZ1nX9fHDYwxEqrAvsADmecrU0B4fM7iYuMKE7hAqtg/QbdCw/w4na7lluzwg4P\r
+vnO7dfDaauSrbw7AUaaQw/O0HB+tzynEvqwwbVXQoO1CLQm0NH5BpILv0pfjCcFN\r
+TfphY2aZ/kEIEwq9pb+R5JjwDzY2KA+lr2k+1//p0Wgq7mxTWaesGHIoE5fkJscN\r
+zVOu6tlpPZ+r2A8zU42Gs1a9GFuLvXVKUu2bboIS4fATGm1zi/j3WnngLSkRnou4\r
+pYcfYsOmsJI4IQucMbqqeRevi0HS6yyIcTHjzAmQpZdph3RQ+jvftx8izztN5666\r
+Wg59uav0O9Wdp4oCG69D\r
+=47F4\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r