Re: priorities for 0.13

diff --git a/8a/d5bf40b0d4d89fa8003b3b365b67211d9fb482 b/8a/d5bf40b0d4d89fa8003b3b365b67211d9fb482
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..c7f1daa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/8a/d5bf40b0d4d89fa8003b3b365b67211d9fb482
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6210431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:40:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 8YzJpbdNp1t7 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:40:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF879431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:40:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet)\r
+       by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)\r
+       (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1SOZyQ-00047L-AH; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:40:02 -0300\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1SOZyL-0006pD-0o; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:39:53 -0300\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: priorities for 0.13\r
+In-Reply-To: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+140~g0c819b9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:39:52 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87ehr6fhtj.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Spam_bar: -\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:40:09 -0000\r
+\r
+David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> Hi All;\r
+>\r
+> I'd like to have a feature freeze for 0.13 sometime in the first week of\r
+> May.  What do people feel are priorities to try to get reviewed and\r
+> pushed for 0.13?\r
+>\r
+\r
+So here are some patches that people expressed interest in for 0.13, but\r
+need more review.\r
+\r
+     id:"1335056093-17621-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca"\r
+\r
+     id:"1334431301-27303-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com"\r
+\r
+     id:"1335651473-19652-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu"\r
+\r
+Note that in particular it makes sense to push amdragon's changes while\r
+we are bumping the SONAME.\r
+        \r
+The sequence by Jamie\r
+\r
+    id:"1334429574-12918-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net"\r
+\r
+Has only one minor comment about a comment; I'm not sure it's enough for\r
+a rebase on it's own.  Mark, what do you think?\r
+\r
+d\r