--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B84A431FBC\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 06:44:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id tPDx9l96hPSd for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Fri, 1 Jun 2012 06:44:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB5BC431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 06:44:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+ ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet)\r
+ by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)\r
+ (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+ id 1SaS96-0006QZ-8V; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:44:04 -0300\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)\r
+ (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+ id 1SaS90-0003Oy-U5; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:43:58 -0300\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,\r
+ Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+Subject: Re: Can't compile notmuch-delivery\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <CAMP44s0vvEDLd2DceFraNpqyMrX2A+=zkV6W=ABatZs52FNo5Q@mail.gmail.com>\r
+References: <20120531214259.GA18272@desktop>\r
+ <m2pq9jo7jf.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+ <CAMP44s0vvEDLd2DceFraNpqyMrX2A+=zkV6W=ABatZs52FNo5Q@mail.gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:43:58 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87lik7171d.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Spam_bar: -\r
+Cc: Ali Polatel <alip@exherbo.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:44:12 -0000\r
+\r
+Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:\r
+\r
+> I would be in favor of reverting these changes, and possibly put them\r
+> in a separate branch, until they are ready (as in all notmuch code\r
+> compiles).\r
+\r
+We have already released the this code and put people through the SONAME\r
+bump, so I don't really think reverting the code makes sense. \r
+\r
+I guess we should clarify what it means to accept some code into\r
+contrib. Do we accept to maintain it even after the original contributor\r
+loses interest? \r
+\r
+d\r