--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F56431FBD\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:51:07 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.798\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+ FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id LkuBT-aLrYTx for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:51:06 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com\r
+ [209.85.212.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC1EB431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:51:06 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by mail-vb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fc21so4864275vbb.26\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:51:05 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;\r
+ bh=9JVbuiFzWIr2N7MabL0rR+K/11XvNdJ9f/CfHapmZH8=;\r
+ b=CwbkU4fjG3usHG9IbQRG128jM+b8DXvJY73UwToCIyvnPybxwpJ1tCeECfUbL72J0D\r
+ IKhZlhT7BVzDi/w/MqRWpriwRFrUQGK25mZevt/eLQ+cn5CEJ5adnOaZLHCMcR42ITIy\r
+ zLItxL2xaX7fHzzNK4RJvT9CPiQ8eUsHAvfzCnvQMkmbqfNl2DdmhEFkO8DOZUiaumKn\r
+ jyYurWZzrgC8aG+vZVyqaWQQ6HXYBLooN044RmRBBglX1q/zHo5gEufSHeDcGX1xcKNB\r
+ dvxe/TIUJfieNQxYgtE+fMdLxfMJlIoRyrBHFcHYXb09htP86PA5VzyXJsisRHIr87HX\r
+ 1t0w==\r
+Received: by 10.220.220.5 with SMTP id hw5mr16968905vcb.53.1353293464930; Sun,\r
+ 18 Nov 2012 18:51:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.220.247.209 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:50:44 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Ethan <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com>\r
+Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:50:44 -0500\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAOJ+Ob2Fha8n_ZretgesHgiB2UgTKiNh-cwxQ-_NGw=CkX7Wzw@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: emacs's function special form\r
+To: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>\r
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9cfcc02410a3104ced030a9\r
+Cc: notmuch mailing list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 02:51:07 -0000\r
+\r
+--14dae9cfcc02410a3104ced030a9\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+\r
+> 2012ko azaroak 18an, Ethan Glasser-Camp-ek idatzi zuen:\r
+> >\r
+> > - You might want to use #' on lambdas.\r
+>\r
+> This is actually unnecessary =96 as the info node "(elisp) Anonymous\r
+> Functions" says, the forms with and without #' are equivalent. The\r
+> current notmuch style is not to have #' on lambdas (that is, there are 0\r
+> instances of #'(lambda ...) in the code base). IMO that=92s correct:\r
+> the unnecessary #' is just line-noise-ish.\r
+>\r
+\r
+OK, I think I understand. Thanks for the clarification. I found that info\r
+node very confusing.\r
+\r
+It says that #' has effects "assuming function-object is a valid lambda\r
+expression". So why put #' on variables that are the names of functions?\r
+\r
+In fact, outside names of functions, when are you supposed to use #' at all=\r
+?\r
+\r
+Ethan\r
+\r
+--14dae9cfcc02410a3104ced030a9\r
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Aaron Ecay <spa=\r
+n dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:aaronecay@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">=\r
+aaronecay@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quo=\r
+te" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"=\r
+>\r
+\r
+2012ko azaroak 18an, Ethan Glasser-Camp-ek idatzi zuen:<br>\r
+<div class=3D"im">><br>\r
+> - You might want to use #' on lambdas.<br>\r
+<br>\r
+</div>This is actually unnecessary =96 as the info node "(elisp) Anony=\r
+mous<br>\r
+Functions" says, the forms with and without #' are equivalent. =A0=\r
+The<br>\r
+current notmuch style is not to have #' on lambdas (that is, there are =\r
+0<br>\r
+instances of #'(lambda ...) in the code base). =A0IMO that=92s correct:=\r
+<br>\r
+the unnecessary #' is just line-noise-ish.<br></blockquote><div><br>OK,=\r
+ I think I understand. Thanks for the clarification. I found that info node=\r
+ very confusing.<br><br>It says that #' has effects "assuming func=\r
+tion-object is a valid lambda expression". So why put #' on variab=\r
+les that are the names of functions?<br>\r
+\r
+<br>In fact, outside names of functions, when are you supposed to use #'=\r
+; at all?<br><br>Ethan<br><br></div></div>\r
+\r
+--14dae9cfcc02410a3104ced030a9--\r