--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B25431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 01:10:40 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id 0uuYcYDlzgig for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Thu, 6 Sep 2012 01:10:39 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE08431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 01:10:39 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4])\r
+ by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1812E19F32ED;\r
+ Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:10:34 +0200 (CEST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS\r
+Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1])\r
+ by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new,\r
+ port 10044)\r
+ with ESMTP id dVHkoaQ-aWoZ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:10:29 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34])\r
+ by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A14C3CFE74;\r
+ Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:10:28 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from steelpick.2x.cz (note-sojka.felk.cvut.cz [147.32.86.30])\r
+ (Authenticated sender: sojkam1)\r
+ by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB439660904;\r
+ Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:10:28 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from wsh by steelpick.2x.cz with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+ (envelope-from <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>)\r
+ id 1T9XAS-0004l7-JO; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 10:10:28 +0200\r
+From: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Add customization group for replying\r
+In-Reply-To: <m21uih6k2t.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+References: <1343311113-22171-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+ <87vcfu2qap.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>\r
+ <m2ligqnoap.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+ <87zk55n44x.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>\r
+ <m21uih6k2t.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+23~g9d68aca (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 10:10:28 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <874nnbvaff.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 08:10:40 -0000\r
+\r
+On Wed, Sep 05 2012, Tomi Ollila wrote:\r
+> On Tue, Sep 04 2012, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrote:\r
+>\r
+>> On Tue, Sep 04 2012, Tomi Ollila wrote:\r
+>>> On Tue, Sep 04 2012, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrote:\r
+>>>\r
+>>>> On Thu, Jul 26 2012, Michal Sojka wrote:\r
+>>>>> When one wants to customize the format of reply message, there nothing\r
+>>>>> to tell the user how to do it. Without knowing that construction of\r
+>>>>> reply buffer is actually implemented in the message package, it seems\r
+>>>>> that replying cannot be customized.\r
+>>>>>\r
+>>>>> Because I was getting annoyed by the empty line the between citation\r
+>>>>> line and the quoted message, I figured out that changing this is fairly\r
+>>>>> easy when one knows what to customize.\r
+>>>>>\r
+>>>>> This patch adds notmuch-reply customization group that that contains\r
+>>>>> references to the relevant customization options. The new group is easy\r
+>>>>> to find as it is shown as a result of running "M-x customize-group RET\r
+>>>>> notmuch RET".\r
+>>>>\r
+>>>> Ping.\r
+>>>>\r
+>>>> Any objections against applying?\r
+>>>\r
+>>> Nobody dares to say anything due to infamiliriaty of this spesific case ;/.\r
+>>>\r
+>>> I could not find any reference this has been made before.\r
+>>\r
+>> It's at least documented at\r
+>> http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Group-Definitions.html\r
+>>\r
+>> The argument members is a list specifying an initial set of\r
+>> customization items to be members of the group. However, most often\r
+>> members is nil, and you specify the group's members by using the\r
+>> :group keyword when defining those members.\r
+>>\r
+>>> I could not find any discussion about this issue.\r
+>>>\r
+>>> With little effort I could not extract the customization tree to\r
+>>> stdout I could have attempted to grep whether there is same variable\r
+>>> in many groups.\r
+>>\r
+>> I tried to grep emacs sources and found the following:\r
+>>\r
+>> (defgroup message '((user-mail-address custom-variable)\r
+>> (defgroup gnus-message '((message custom-group))\r
+>> (defgroup ps-print-printer '((lpr custom-group))\r
+>> (defgroup customize '((widgets custom-group))\r
+>> (defgroup font-lock '((jit-lock custom-group))\r
+>>\r
+>> At least the first line corresponds exactly to what is proposed in my\r
+>> patch.\r
+>\r
+> Yes...\r
+>\r
+>\r
+> I was looking whether the same customization variable has been put\r
+> into multiple groups (now those are also in message-insertion group like\r
+> you have in your patch). (So far) I haven't seen that to be done\r
+> (not that it forbids doing so, just that there aren't issues about that).\r
+>\r
+> From consistency point of view all the customization variables in notmuch\r
+> groups start with "notmuch-" and these "message-" breaks this... An\r
+> alternative to the above could be the following:\r
+>\r
+> (defgroup notmuch-reply\r
+> '((notmuch-message-replied-tags custom-variable)\r
+> (message-insertion custom-group))\r
+> "..."\r
+\r
+Why not. Updated patch follows...\r
+\r
+-Michal\r