Re: [PATCH 0/4 v4] lib: Maildir flags synchronization fixes

diff --git a/39/078c7ba8245b275f75de3f52263115a21fce3f b/39/078c7ba8245b275f75de3f52263115a21fce3f
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..c399142
--- /dev/null
+++ b/39/078c7ba8245b275f75de3f52263115a21fce3f
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1EA6431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  5 Nov 2012 18:17:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 70ZpCNs1j3X2 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon,  5 Nov 2012 18:17:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57E9B431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  5 Nov 2012 18:17:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet)\r
+       by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa\r
+       (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1TVYio-0004wt-6m; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:17:00 -0400\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1TVYiS-0004ns-NR; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:16:36 -0400\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Daniel <quite@hack.org>, Louis Rilling <l.rilling@av7.net>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v4] lib: Maildir flags synchronization fixes\r
+In-Reply-To: <20121106001633.GA14918@kelebek.lublin.se>\r
+References: <20121106001633.GA14918@kelebek.lublin.se>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+75~g984212d (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:16:36 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87d2zro4qj.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-Spam_bar: -\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 02:17:05 -0000\r
+\r
+Daniel <quite@hack.org> writes:\r
+\r
+> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 08:41:42PM -0400, David Bremner wrote:\r
+>> I pushed the first two patches in this series; the second two need to be\r
+>> updated for the new "broken test" framework, and reviewed.\r
+>\r
+> And old one... What came of this patch?\r
+>\r
+> I came across it, having been annoyed by the fact that notmuch broke my reading\r
+> habits by marking messages (in the mutt sense) as seen, which I hadn't really\r
+> seen yet in mutt. I tried out the patch; it applied and seems to work. What can\r
+> I do to make it be applied? Other than giving it some attention. I must say\r
+> that I have zero insight in the test framework, but if that's what's needed\r
+> from me...\r
+\r
+The patches need to be reviewed for correctness and style. Typically any\r
+non-trivial patch (or series) needs two reviews. You can see examples in\r
+the archives of how this works.  They are currently marked stale, which\r
+is supposed to mean they no long apply. On the other hand, if they apply\r
+for you, maybe that tagging is wrong (see http://notmuchmail.org/nmbug/\r
+for more information about patch tagging).\r
+\r
+By the way, it seems like commit b88030b might be relevant.\r
+\r
+d\r