Re: plans for 0.12

diff --git a/9b/87d2250ce9c9721ea05c526b6f9bcdd8190fdf b/9b/87d2250ce9c9721ea05c526b6f9bcdd8190fdf
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..af4e681
--- /dev/null
+++ b/9b/87d2250ce9c9721ea05c526b6f9bcdd8190fdf
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+Return-Path: <pieter@praet.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E54E431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  7 Mar 2012 11:52:16 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 4wQEOOILEgTV for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed,  7 Mar 2012 11:52:15 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (mail-ww0-f45.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.45])       (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))        (No client\r
+ certificate requested)        by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
+ 7A7FD431FAE   for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  7 Mar 2012 11:52:15 -0800\r
+ (PST)\r
+Received: by wgbds10 with SMTP id ds10so3355575wgb.2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:52:14 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.180.24.4 with SMTP id q4mr28694884wif.7.1331149934119;\r
+       Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:52:14 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost ([109.131.36.23])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h19sm38115817wiw.9.2012.03.07.11.52.13\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:52:13 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: plans for 0.12\r
+In-Reply-To: <8762eo2b89.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <87mx87j8eh.fsf@zancas.localnet> <877gz4dnl2.fsf@praet.org>\r
+       <8762eo2b89.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+210~g6afc43e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:52:05 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87fwdk42ai.fsf@praet.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQlLDboJMebkPpABL7VC6cXGXbzFlOPPiRVnpAsXKLfvOJdYHjU1ArmJywH4ctY3SWJ3WY6L\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 19:52:16 -0000\r
+\r
+On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:43:50 -0400, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:21:29 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:\r
+> > \r
+> > Some of the features added/refactored post-0.11.1 don't have any\r
+> > test coverage yet.  Should they, before wrapping up 0.12 ?\r
+> > (not a rhetorical question, I'm genuinely asking for opinions)\r
+> > \r
+> \r
+> Hi Pieter;\r
+> \r
+> My initial answer is probably not. I see the tests as mainly useful\r
+> during development, for detecting regressions. I think most people doing\r
+> development will be working from git, rather than the distribution\r
+> tarballs we ship.   \r
+> \r
+> On the other hand, adding tests is also not that risky, so if the\r
+> concensus is strongly in favour of integrating them pre 0.12, and\r
+> somebody wants to review them all, then I'm willing to consider it.\r
+>\r
+\r
+Fair enough.\r
+\r
+Just in case anyone considers them beneficial and/or is willing to\r
+review (whether it be for inclusion in 0.12 or later), I've gotten\r
+rid of the merge conflict by moving the last test to a new file\r
+called `emacs-search' [1] (also see [2]).  Other than that, it\r
+remains unchanged.\r
+\r
+> d\r
+\r
+\r
+Peace\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Pieter\r
+\r
+[1] id:"1331149792-17192-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org"\r
+[2] id:"87aa47euao.fsf@praet.org"\r