Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers

diff --git a/f5/973956a504d71689988a0c664973fdee12772e b/f5/973956a504d71689988a0c664973fdee12772e
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..9a597d8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/f5/973956a504d71689988a0c664973fdee12772e
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AE1431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  4 Jul 2012 01:25:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id nn246AbxbId0 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed,  4 Jul 2012 01:25:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A209F431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  4 Jul 2012 01:25:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by pbbrr13 with SMTP id rr13so13319298pbb.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:25:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references\r
+       :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition\r
+       :content-transfer-encoding;\r
+       bh=Tx0Ceeu51/tA59K/OKJ3w6/z5tceQjfdTz+xpfGQZkw=;\r
+       b=vT1znrPQlgAjWhr29KEIs2OEQGgjsg9trGEJXei1ewXY57+y9pPs8nCxvsaq3nKuWl\r
+       OXM03TFj9uJu0AAEvZz8ThnXduQt5SvhfgmXnLdkIlUgpSqxuSSbD6GH306El/rc24nC\r
+       wxiCJbTnkUL5aFN7G7rrz9vTqOV5HiNqpXVa4kbpoGVgES7R99kKo1CuJi7gL+1sqoLJ\r
+       YsIEjX3KOhHqslsp6pJ6DWlY3LXPvubdqBea9DrjxqIUXW32VHYTrqEYw9xYgmrZZSbD\r
+       1gyAfmj0B4qTqYeGZOTxcXEwKW9ZVQq118g/TJGGagfDwJ+/pwsQn/bZfXjmmmefbsQg\r
+       460A==\r
+Received: by 10.68.219.162 with SMTP id pp2mr16139802pbc.85.1341390305602;\r
+       Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:25:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.\r
+       [220.233.42.215])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id iv8sm17276798pbc.53.2012.07.04.01.25.02\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:25:04 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 18:24:59 +1000\r
+Message-ID: <20120704182459.GI2342@hili.localdomain>\r
+From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers\r
+In-Reply-To: <87pq8c6zad.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <1340508470-16606-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+       <1340508470-16606-2-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+       <87vci471tw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <20120704115951.GC2342@hili.localdomain>\r
+       <87pq8c6zad.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 08:25:11 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 19:22:18 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+> On Tue, Jul 03 2012, Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> > I want to see what the sender intended, before hitting reply.\r
+> \r
+> Given that there have been requests to see a lot of other headers as\r
+> well, we probably need to have a discussion about which ones are worth\r
+> of emitting, and how we give the user some more general control to see\r
+> the ones they want.  Either that or we just emit them all?\r
+\r
+If we start with the obvious:\r
+\r
+  notmuch show --output-headers=date,from,subject,to,cc,reply-to ...\r
+\r
+with the default being the current set.\r
+\r
+Emitting everything would be easier but seems wasteful.  I just looked\r
+at a random message: in RFC822 syntax the header is 4073 bytes, and the\r
+body is 1116 bytes.  Keeping only the fields that notmuch emits reduces\r
+the header to 295 bytes.  Reply-To is 92 bytes, but not every message\r
+has that.\r
+\r
+Peter\r