search summary and exclusions
authorPeter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>
Mon, 28 May 2012 14:00:12 +0000 (00:00 +1000)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:47:29 +0000 (09:47 -0800)
47/6baacfa5d44e88d4ccbc1b0935477878385635 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/47/6baacfa5d44e88d4ccbc1b0935477878385635 b/47/6baacfa5d44e88d4ccbc1b0935477878385635
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2570ddf
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1982C431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 28 May 2012 07:00:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id fcOXkJds8qG9 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 28 May 2012 07:00:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3F96431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 28 May 2012 07:00:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by pbbrr13 with SMTP id rr13so5828462pbb.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 28 May 2012 07:00:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type\r
+       :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding;\r
+       bh=Q7tczjLxBckf76MVU0+B+gDS6bjBQARQyp1lA74eqjc=;\r
+       b=W6M25YHu2zwrgoqeb3bo7z6TFlD9V0tc2mHrIvFu1ueOFCVXbysnvsXLUgK9VK4jtR\r
+       DieC/nRzuEXpZVmm+Ib0Tdcf86MMykb0RIk0Jgym/kKpM57NTvEqQ25Uwz+iKP4y2SON\r
+       XC3VxKGk+Ji+n1aHfo6D7ORb6mjKZWJeaYJBGn/3PbNcUrOdJ229QY1y96uG3vk4rQAS\r
+       sH+F0eEUegOKV1G4YbGyX/p8/EXVU6xda152MB8ZWgrjkpTHVV78dg5TkUybJbs1WR/l\r
+       UJXOlvkCqSXxbSyuR6bOTOIYy/SZ3Qdqw3qLCUESpaIVzDSr+G5b6ewUSF3+rgfmPY7s\r
+       covw==\r
+Received: by 10.68.194.105 with SMTP id hv9mr27963603pbc.126.1338213618827;\r
+       Mon, 28 May 2012 07:00:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.\r
+       [220.233.42.215])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pb3sm10695515pbc.6.2012.05.28.07.00.16\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Mon, 28 May 2012 07:00:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 00:00:12 +1000\r
+Message-ID: <20120529000012.GF2331@hili.localdomain>\r
+From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: search summary and exclusions\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 14:00:20 -0000\r
+\r
+Hi,\r
+\r
+Exclusions don't work the way I expected with the search command and\r
+--output=summary.  I would like messages with excluded tags to be\r
+treated as if they don't exist at all, but currently:\r
+\r
+  * excluded messages are counted towards the "total"\r
+  * excluded tags are included in the "tags" set\r
+\r
+Are these deliberate?  Especially the second point seems to conflict\r
+with search --output=tags, which doesn't show excluded tags.\r
+\r
+Peter\r