Re: [RFC] Smart replying

diff --git a/b6/76537040b7a0fe55b8a455b081172e11b6c62a b/b6/76537040b7a0fe55b8a455b081172e11b6c62a
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..8927419
--- /dev/null
+++ b/b6/76537040b7a0fe55b8a455b081172e11b6c62a
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+Return-Path: <fauno@kiwwwi.com.ar>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81948431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  1 Mar 2012 13:02:47 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.01\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 3j9sO+P-P79t for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu,  1 Mar 2012 13:02:47 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from rshg051.localdomain (rshg051.dnsready.net [174.142.147.194])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0C3431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  1 Mar 2012 13:02:46 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from kiwwwi.com.ar (unknown [186.60.157.116])\r
+       by rshg051.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D06943518B9E\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  1 Mar 2012 18:02:45 -0300 (ART)\r
+From: =?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds <fauno@kiwwwi.com.ar>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Cc: \r
+Subject: Re: [RFC] Smart replying\r
+In-Reply-To: <87hay8xdoe.fsf@jhu.edu>\r
+References: <87hay8xdoe.fsf@jhu.edu>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/ (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:02:09 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <8762eom3vy.fsf@kiwwwi.com.ar>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:02:47 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:35:13 -0500, Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu> wr=\r
+ote:\r
+> Dear All,\r
+>=20\r
+> I know that folks recently got done haggling over reply bindings, but\r
+> there's something I've been using for a little while, and I was curious\r
+> about whether it's something people would be interested in. Forgive me\r
+> if this functionality was already discussed and I missed it.\r
+>=20\r
+> The problem is that I often forget to reply-all to list mails and write\r
+> out half a message, and then have to cut and paste. So, as usual, my\r
+> solution is to try and have emacs figure it out for me.\r
+>=20\r
+> Pretty simple: have a variable `reply-all-list'. If an address in the\r
+> `To' or `CC' fields is in that list, 'r' replies-all. If not, it\r
+> replies-sender. CTRL-r (or whatever) forces `reply-sender', on the rare\r
+> occasion I want to take a conversation offline.\r
+>=20\r
+> The nice thing about this is, if `reply-all-list' is nil, then it acts\r
+> as normal, so it wouldn't make a difference to most users.\r
+>=20\r
+> The implementation that's been sitting in my .emacs is below. I'm not\r
+> offering it as a patch, because I don't quite understand the current\r
+> relation of notmuch-show.el and notmuch-mua.el.=20\r
+>=20\r
+> If people are interested, though, I could make it into a patch. And, if\r
+> not, I hope it's a snippet that someone finds useful.\r
+\r
+I'll try it, it's been bothering me also on reply-to-list lists :)\r
+\r
+(There's also C-c C-l but it doesn't work for me)\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPT+PRAAoJEEVgMtcXpM2cLXgIAK4KsZyNXmfLKRSFsjsoBMok\r
+PyJv9tJ5uwFW1IU5r3K1o/ErBSm4zsCMcZx9DOM45neLdVCA6Vf8as4eWOfHyxLn\r
+Plo+Ba79zGoxNqrwnZhEJpXzLUC7a0xKOw5A3hDpxYdu2f2yxz4L/iKvJKqKJtWd\r
+CmY98JGlph9twP03+XH53NDDyqCSUpUllhCYOt3njM/7fOpLal8LaMt3yB718tYU\r
+fBm4pJRxJwXZHPlbr+oqZXd1jtxZ6LXITYubrShtob9ocSJR/MMHWb7lG/Fq++GI\r
+JdqiGS7BrZANSajVz4vkVKKYPI5lTqr81B8D07Pf5Ea2b+odMqQ6HQGPyQDGk+0=\r
+=E7Lo\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r