Reply code with TEXT/PLAIN

diff --git a/55/78531cac9e56d2ecbab42719be49aa73dd877d b/55/78531cac9e56d2ecbab42719be49aa73dd877d
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..488c8ab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/55/78531cac9e56d2ecbab42719be49aa73dd877d
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D89F431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:49:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id H3G1b1O2OkJz for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:49:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2E1C431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:49:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1SBYpw-000077-8O; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:49:24 +0000\r
+Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]\r
+       helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1SBYpv-0006qZ-Pd; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:49:23 +0000\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Reply code with TEXT/PLAIN\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+65~g8bf1842 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:49:36 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <87d3814qkv.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 81184fa3cf15241b16be16260c7c8c4d (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored -1.8 points.\r
+       Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+       *      medium trust\r
+       *      [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay\r
+       *      domain\r
+       *  0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:49:26 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+I am not certain if this is a bug or a request to work around broken\r
+mailers. I tried replying to a message today (with recent git) and got\r
+an empty message. I looked at the json output for reply and it contains\r
+the message but the content type is TEXT/PLAIN rather than\r
+text/plain.\r
+\r
+This seems to mean it doesn't match in notmuch-match-content-type\r
+(notmuch-lib.el) called from notmuch-mua-get-quotable-parts (in\r
+notmuch-mua.el); and so does not get included.\r
+\r
+Making the match case-insensitive `fixed' the problem.\r
+\r
+I don't know whether content-types are allowed  to be upper-case but I\r
+seem to have several mails where they are. I am also not sure whether\r
+the correct fix is in the emacs code, or in the cli reply format\r
+(i.e. perhaps the reply format should lower-case the content-type).\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+PS Sorry Adam for the duplicate: I sent from a wrong address (my fault\r
+this time)!\r