Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] cli: modify mime_node_context to use the new notmuch_crypto_t

diff --git a/36/627442fa47aad504d978a71c0a1c1948c871a0 b/36/627442fa47aad504d978a71c0a1c1948c871a0
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..aaa4f0a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36/627442fa47aad504d978a71c0a1c1948c871a0
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FD4431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:18:02 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id puJTolz1bvIV for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri, 18 May 2012 12:18:00 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D35A431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:17:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2D52E50BD5;\r
+       Fri, 18 May 2012 12:17:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (rrcs-24-103-26-131.nyc.biz.rr.com\r
+       [24.103.26.131]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506922E50DFC;\r
+       Fri, 18 May 2012 12:17:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 3BD054AD; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:17:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] cli: modify mime_node_context to use the new\r
+       notmuch_crypto_t\r
+In-Reply-To: <20120518190925.GU11804@mit.edu>\r
+References: <1337362357-31281-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+       <1337362357-31281-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+       <1337362357-31281-3-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+       <1337362357-31281-4-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+       <20120518190925.GU11804@mit.edu>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+183~g9d5ff3c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:17:49 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87wr499u3m.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:18:02 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Fri, May 18 2012, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:\r
+>> -           (GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), node->ctx->cryptoctx, &err);\r
+>> +           (GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), node->ctx->crypto.gpgctx, &err);\r
+>\r
+> This should be crypto->gpgctx.\r
+\r
+Weird.  Good catch, Austin!  But I must admit I'm thoroughly confused.\r
+I tested every stage of this series right before I sent, and sure enough\r
+this patch compiles cleanly and all tests pass.  Can anyone explain why?\r
+I don't understand.  I'll send a new version of this one patch now\r
+anyway.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPtqBdAAoJEO00zqvie6q8O/MP/ihaPSKfWHytzM6N/1QrXICr\r
+ktem0YFo4uISK9dj8sGhKZiqOEoOEkn09Q5Lz1vpznMOcaj4SrcrfjKfKHGqriuf\r
+Ogp5Ll6WauI0UWlvMTkxyh3mLQq78vxzf6F2ivkR8C+hBgT88MPLoDl+CGA2Nt4S\r
+whJLGPf9Zq5HmtxPlqbBcMsSMzQn6C7bb1iFE/tTOj2ORpkWkX5SsCmIuF+GdcSZ\r
+RLu3Rr0UCaFbK8hhLK0pRRLB0EtiMx8EBEPLofDnvYyOe+JGEjsXIpTeNXRGT/7i\r
+pzsWJpUpu3wj+pNQjWmijIEuuwDq4iY0h0Dvxswl9OlZhAKdNcf9GOtSjmjseOB6\r
+CzIHXKgkUHzM9SIAGSzmQIiUGYGNKogA/6+u9H7zVdYn6MTt/yHKpJ1jNVWT2B/E\r
+0oh3D6FmVOGEto09L9kiJGZ+eJLaeMQ9yJFKLPPu/Rv9hcItdeuQ1MteUnFpqpXh\r
+qCljLK1Kb+Cr7Am+kGOTYjZw5M1XhsFz8l4CVN3CtLnWs0SFApE7YuO89mhuLmMc\r
+ULuhN/apP27CYmJkioaTZkSw+oFtwhROM3YkpJXEidId0T9lcm2wl2EXldT6qR9P\r
+xkf970yd27NXh/WuYIh1CJ3WinlGxqYl6Apihj+Vo/V8kG1va0QsWCRQK/i7T3XM\r
+2y3gVOlx8p9AvEoXc8Oh\r
+=RBIl\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r