Re: [PATCH 7/8] lib: add NOTMUCH_EXCLUDE_FLAG to notmuch_exclude_t

diff --git a/84/f20316af58c91dd1b530e1c5d2722031f707f8 b/84/f20316af58c91dd1b530e1c5d2722031f707f8
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..f78ea8b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/84/f20316af58c91dd1b530e1c5d2722031f707f8
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+Return-Path: <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A463431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 06:03:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id Jfd8Bcy4L0hN for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 21 Oct 2012 06:03:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.212.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16CB8431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 06:03:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-vb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fc21so2157855vbb.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 06:03:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id\r
+       :mime-version:content-type;\r
+       bh=FhAsPqeF/ajix1TtG9FfCEbWav128lPnAq2TvMrpwmc=;\r
+       b=VHbxD+23x1kMmVZCj1+l9eHd5qmyJlZu6jho+mk1yI3eMbrSrzrg7MgXpz6f2/H/ga\r
+       APvV/loeMGqEVieeeiuPCp9GMgm+N0Bm07UKclsTYJZcTu2S8aVL2oEy6H+kPaFqeGQf\r
+       JDhM5NpmRjQ/fy0slZNwGK03Wp4rPwe+sgaYlZxMt8n/iWrb5zSZQKf0X+A6VvZaw/v2\r
+       RJ91Ys4Agol2TLSOyIY6PnSjVKU5432PgMyTDS4dXTiYq0NftZsl7fonmFGKLuZvBUKT\r
+       /Hof6CrM+ko8EJ9FSo9upfOP+xNm0rM0xhK9xh63QHNjS7OCJTwaRXi8F+Hsl2yiOJvQ\r
+       GikQ==\r
+Received: by 10.52.97.200 with SMTP id ec8mr7796169vdb.89.1350824591533;\r
+       Sun, 21 Oct 2012 06:03:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.gmail.com (p70-80.acedsl.com. [66.114.70.80])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u2sm7213017vdt.11.2012.10.21.06.03.10\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Sun, 21 Oct 2012 06:03:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Ethan Glasser-Camp <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com>\r
+To: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] lib: add NOTMUCH_EXCLUDE_FLAG to notmuch_exclude_t\r
+In-Reply-To: <20121021130427.GA4820@hili.localdomain>\r
+References: <1340198947-29370-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+       <1340198947-29370-8-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+       <87txtr6o0c.fsf@betacantrips.com>\r
+       <20121021130427.GA4820@hili.localdomain>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+45~g6ea9330 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 09:03:08 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87hapo565v.fsf@betacantrips.com>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 13:03:12 -0000\r
+\r
+Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com> writes:\r
+\r
+> Does it help if you add a "sleep 1" before the second generate_message\r
+> call, i.e. on line 35?\r
+\r
+It turns out that this test failure is sporadic (perhaps due to the fact\r
+that I'm running on tmpfs) and exists even before this series. Doing\r
+"sleep 1" makes it go away, but that "fix" is unrelated to this series\r
+and ought to be fixed elsewhere.\r
+\r
+> I have to disagree.  The condition is wrapped over two lines.  The then\r
+> part is wrapped over two lines.  The else part already has braces.\r
+> All suggest braces around the then part.\r
+\r
+If Tomi is OK with it, then I guess it's fine. And it's true that there\r
+are a couple of places where braces are used with long conditions and\r
+then-parts.\r
+\r
+This series has my +1.\r
+\r
+Ethan\r