--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB39431FBC\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 00:24:46 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id VkR12Rk6XPXX for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Fri, 7 Dec 2012 00:24:44 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+ [131.215.239.19])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2556C431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 00:24:44 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A192E508C7;\r
+ Fri, 7 Dec 2012 00:24:41 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-166-145-133.socal.res.rr.com\r
+ [76.166.145.133]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+ by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5812E50677;\r
+ Fri, 7 Dec 2012 00:24:37 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+ id 29754616EF; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 00:24:37 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, Peter Feigl <craven@gmx.net>,\r
+ notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] Use the S-Expression structured printer in\r
+ notmuch-show, notmuch-reply and notmuch-search.\r
+In-Reply-To: <87txry5m08.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+References: <cover.1354794428.git.craven@gmx.net>\r
+ <9cb474a271c471f8bae8b55b0148bb970ba78ceb.1354794428.git.craven@gmx.net>\r
+ <871uf2in54.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+ <87txry5m08.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+143~g175686e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:24:36 -0800\r
+Message-ID: <87mwxqgth7.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+ micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:24:46 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+\r
+On Fri, Dec 07 2012, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:\r
+>\r
+>> On Thu, Dec 06 2012, Peter Feigl <craven@gmx.net> wrote:\r
+>>> - /* Any changes to the JSON format should be reflected in the file\r
+>>> - * devel/schemata. */\r
+>>> + /* Any changes to the JSON or S-Expression format should be\r
+>>> + * reflected in the file devel/schemata. */\r
+>>\r
+>> Can we just make these comments more general, so we don't have to tweak\r
+>> them every time a new formatter is added?\r
+>\r
+> I think I agree, but I think it may as well wait until we have more than\r
+> the two formats. In other words I would suggest not holding up the\r
+> (latest version) of this series for this.\r
+\r
+Yes, that's totally fair. I didn't notice later that a new version of\r
+the patch had already been sent.\r
+\r
+I haven't had a chance to review the patches, but I am certainly all for\r
+the feature. Definitely don't hold it up on this account.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQwafEAAoJEO00zqvie6q87O8P/A80+dLNpZ3M9nDNl9aV1TZW\r
+XV6m8wWrDi2pz8FHaZQ4en0Y0dwJ/t2rCCMN2bPEieLZrgm+ktd3LU7jY/pkYBip\r
+Q1DJsHw41HiPTz9O0bSremCa2U+GzJ5iXyP/euHnRcm6Q4cppqJDQ8btDWA9zc7Z\r
+zg7g24/pXS9DSxwMbFcGnU/aMJWYwr8JtOWEFBaHANeTqd5WdE9uzG6N9q3tSrcI\r
+nUqRjqLjI7SVy0u/Rw32j0LsGg8UNIO8zvVuBwHU+dO3AdQI2OUzJVyaP2NFoGXd\r
+tV40Qzn3/XQkS6OkIkkwGeJb5UrhpvrrSjaSdfqfj1lAjyYL/vxg4viX/LGR16KP\r
+YvN9NldyvKUzgJHfAuO5Lv0FWyWiPiI3ZGoL3xLmHH4A+O/1Ap9HUSfAcVy7/xRJ\r
+Yq+JMagdfg0g/whVteEFtTswxbRBWKB7KWQV7k5gNfKQiTPttkNqvZB1odrRu97H\r
+s2FqyBhE3y9pOmqqRDcE6KiPfHQLx3KHmkYajqOFHD0u6A0Sr8v+PD/kUfOGFNXz\r
+SSPwNwtR2jbm7CLLRhg0Pxdto8v4GxJkG6sLTdc1hk0Du9JBzw6XEBgv31syRJe9\r
+kfQBoGbye2ESQ+kfAveXiiD6Jw4kjUFu8W1KaLhdE8rjUeTNPfzVqbcNAnQn4cU0\r
+jcf436O/Ljlhm4NlYutJ\r
+=YxVI\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r