--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BBD431FBF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:33:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.699\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id AuAkE+bu-fuG for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:33:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com\r
+ [209.85.213.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE2AE431FAF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:33:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by yhp26 with SMTP id 26so7354610yhp.26\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:33:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
+ :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;\r
+ bh=kkYT1qNHPyU7ombz8xwDlgXa047mUZ2fZf3lH1VCyVw=;\r
+ b=ew8oUxV+MBf9Evr822my/Jy4rwcucppW+09O8aTsJgxDba4QJxkQU9AlhnKz5hRFFq\r
+ OkigYAisMIc+offxyy6M8w/XwYEdzNnTkVWvlp7CcYPy27gMNCxpGbSBcXkIPO1THwsb\r
+ NPMsl2r5ea7OflrSou1j1uDjEd5l4swcY+Px0U0m5yg+ueS9W3hmwlkH+ojnwjVhYy+Y\r
+ DzzD8PC5bzAFjiVWq0VrmUQj4N8fx9AIShkXXb7pDIeGgguSSSAHzvuUzcJnqCyRzp8w\r
+ yPd193c1e/zLn/MGobVSOnPPd0Wm7U+dfxpNUo8S6WsYQ5BvYcWBq+j64Y2q4LQv6p2M\r
+ 8eKw==\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.50.161.199 with SMTP id xu7mr4142431igb.68.1340192013991; Wed,\r
+ 20 Jun 2012 04:33:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by 10.64.32.2 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:33:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by 10.64.32.2 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:33:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+In-Reply-To: <uaxtxy69qdz.fsf@pcbe15117.cern.ch>\r
+References: <uaxtxy69qdz.fsf@pcbe15117.cern.ch>\r
+Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:33:33 +0300\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAB+hUn9kZJjdRXT=jnxbtX5-i5XxQfj_GvHWpY+aZhFC3ZDJgg@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: miraculous from: field\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: David Belohrad <david@belohrad.ch>\r
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340563ecc01904c2e5c42d\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQnLjiOtJyv+HDccyib3co/hivcOgOI+3BOALFBAI42ut75W0d72migmgHMuNNVODwrLXNxc\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:33:35 -0000\r
+\r
+--14dae9340563ecc01904c2e5c42d\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+\r
+On Jun 20, 2012 2:25 PM, "David Belohrad" <david@belohrad.ch> wrote:\r
+>\r
+>\r
+> Dear All,\r
+>\r
+> could someone give a hint?\r
+>\r
+> I have an opened mail message. When I press 'r' to reply, a new mail\r
+> buffer is opened and the 'From' field is correctly filled with\r
+> 'david@belohrad.ch'.\r
+>\r
+> When on the same message I press however 'f' to forward the message, new\r
+> buffer opens, but this time the 'From' field contains incorrectly\r
+> 'belohrad@bepc12494.cern.ch', which is clearly a composite of my login\r
+> name and FQHN.\r
+>\r
+> Why that difference and what can I do to mitigate this?\r
+\r
+The reply template comes from 'notmuch reply' cli command, while the\r
+forwarding is internal to the emacs ui. I don't have any quick solutions,\r
+but perhaps in the long run we should do the forwarding template in the cli\r
+too.\r
+\r
+> thanks\r
+>\r
+> david\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r
+\r
+--14dae9340563ecc01904c2e5c42d\r
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8\r
+\r
+<p><br>\r
+On Jun 20, 2012 2:25 PM, "David Belohrad" <<a href="mailto:david@belohrad.ch">david@belohrad.ch</a>> wrote:<br>\r
+><br>\r
+><br>\r
+> Dear All,<br>\r
+><br>\r
+> could someone give a hint?<br>\r
+><br>\r
+> I have an opened mail message. When I press 'r' to reply, a new mail<br>\r
+> buffer is opened and the 'From' field is correctly filled with<br>\r
+> '<a href="mailto:david@belohrad.ch">david@belohrad.ch</a>'.<br>\r
+><br>\r
+> When on the same message I press however 'f' to forward the message, new<br>\r
+> buffer opens, but this time the 'From' field contains incorrectly<br>\r
+> '<a href="mailto:belohrad@bepc12494.cern.ch">belohrad@bepc12494.cern.ch</a>', which is clearly a composite of my login<br>\r
+> name and FQHN.<br>\r
+><br>\r
+> Why that difference and what can I do to mitigate this?</p>\r
+<p>The reply template comes from 'notmuch reply' cli command, while the forwarding is internal to the emacs ui. I don't have any quick solutions, but perhaps in the long run we should do the forwarding template in the cli too.</p>\r
+\r
+<p>> thanks<br>\r
+><br>\r
+> david<br>\r
+> _______________________________________________<br>\r
+> notmuch mailing list<br>\r
+> <a href="mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org">notmuch@notmuchmail.org</a><br>\r
+> <a href="http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch">http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch</a><br>\r
+</p>\r
+\r
+--14dae9340563ecc01904c2e5c42d--\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / commitdiff