Re: Searching from a folder

diff --git a/c2/909a4cbbef542e6233344d465fb5bdca6d137c b/c2/909a4cbbef542e6233344d465fb5bdca6d137c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..cb12e44
--- /dev/null
+++ b/c2/909a4cbbef542e6233344d465fb5bdca6d137c
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+Return-Path: <damien.cassou@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693AF431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 06:18:01 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id iyqJaPM6hjXu for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 29 Sep 2012 06:17:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB34431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 06:17:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by bkcjg15 with SMTP id jg15so4202430bkc.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 06:17:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to\r
+       :cc:content-type;\r
+       bh=5KfTxH6t5wQP4znO0CyJM4vfjEyfJIIyK5NZAzQzRHo=;\r
+       b=yZqmHNrZOa2ly+4N1HFnXtl+mcAzF01DR9DPOTzwNPfUM0mZtVTGQpH4dx1yYeQ4mW\r
+       DgUgtzb9WZBRmDTNZOSYpkglqfwHu0BnFA5eLtbo8puutI7KjaKblWitPMEfZDQPb+5A\r
+       dz0sm2ziLtJfppD+/afiQAuaHQsYtP0DXrPGueOUFqDMwzCkawFX8fNfJvMfiRkqp5u9\r
+       B/qJkNC9zpmZcSKxC6Yg9O8ixaGSTyFuod/fzT6bDtSozIzQ6Lvo/nFdH3MvrQ2YzfT1\r
+       o1sWnvBVTawqQm26d9dcV2M+vEMw6a+pBUcOB86z2bjk+elMkcfySi0luQBH+7NHQf8l\r
+       9TFw==\r
+Received: by 10.204.148.12 with SMTP id n12mr4554586bkv.62.1348924676637; Sat,\r
+       29 Sep 2012 06:17:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.204.40.78 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 06:17:36 -0700 (PDT)\r
+In-Reply-To: <87vcexp03r.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+References:\r
+ <CA+y5ggh-PFtHsRgpdXje9z2gsrsonMNi0gqDTfpQ42jXNmJ3dg@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <87vcexp03r.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+From: Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@gmail.com>\r
+Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 15:17:36 +0200\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CA+y5ggjfo24L=rWDMZ_gpLRiRzWrMC3L2ROcUCufW45yVRDZ-g@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: Searching from a folder\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:18:01 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+> So you have folders named like that in your maildir? It *should* of\r
+> course work with proper escapes and/or quoting\r
+\r
+it works exactly like that with my main gmail account, with exactly\r
+the same folder name.\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Damien Cassou\r
+http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st\r
+\r
+"Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them\r
+popular by not having them." James Iry\r