Re: olra.theworths.org mail forwarding delay?

diff --git a/cb/511580e6725ab8244392692fa9e777aee49912 b/cb/511580e6725ab8244392692fa9e777aee49912
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..b583671
--- /dev/null
+++ b/cb/511580e6725ab8244392692fa9e777aee49912
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+Return-Path: <pieter@praet.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82ABE431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  3 Feb 2012 06:35:38 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id PeqjUL0-31xv for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri,  3 Feb 2012 06:35:37 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (mail-ww0-f45.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.45])       (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))        (No client\r
+ certificate requested)        by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
+ 71CBC431FAE   for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  3 Feb 2012 06:35:37 -0800\r
+ (PST)\r
+Received: by wgbdt12 with SMTP id dt12so3410617wgb.2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:35:36 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.180.82.227 with SMTP id l3mr10062384wiy.1.1328279736169;\r
+       Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:35:36 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost ([109.131.13.166])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l6sm6938830wiv.11.2012.02.03.06.35.35\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:35:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>\r
+To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: olra.theworths.org mail forwarding delay?\r
+In-Reply-To: <m2obtgaw23.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+References: <87bopgp0y9.fsf@praet.org> <m2obtgaw23.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+132~ga81001f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:33:32 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <8762fooukj.fsf@praet.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:35:38 -0000\r
+\r
+On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:25:08 +0200, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:\r
+> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:15:42 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:\r
+> > \r
+> > It appears some messages really enjoy the hospitality @ olra.theworths.org,\r
+> > because they stick around and party for quite a while before moving to their\r
+> > final destinations.\r
+> > \r
+> > Here's some examples:\r
+> > \r
+> > - id:"m28vkzoo8r.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi"\r
+> >   - rcv: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:33:56 -0800 (PST)\r
+> >   - fwd: Thu,  2 Feb 2012 08:57:19 -0800 (PST)\r
+> \r
+> > - id:"87pqeas5mh.fsf@gmail.com"\r
+> >   - rcv: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:15:16 -0800 (PST)\r
+> >   - fwd: Thu,  2 Feb 2012 08:57:25 -0800 (PST)\r
+> > \r
+> > - id:"m2hazk83xw.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi"\r
+> >   - rcv: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:35:52 -0800 (PST)\r
+> >   - fwd: Thu,  2 Feb 2012 08:57:30 -0800 (PST)\r
+> > \r
+> > - id:"alpine.DEB.2.02.1201132130220.21970@ltspubuntu4.int.smq.datapipe.net"\r
+> >   - rcv: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:52:15 -0800 (PST)\r
+> >   - fwd: Thu,  2 Feb 2012 08:56:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+> > \r
+> > That last one might have been stuck in the approval queue, but the\r
+> > others should definitely have propagated a lot sooner, no?\r
+> \r
+> Those 2 my emails had From: email address which is not subscribed\r
+> to this list...\r
+> \r
+\r
+Oh, now that you mention it.\r
+\r
+Assuming the others suffered the same issue, all is well in Mailman-land.\r
+\r
+\r
+Thanks!\r
+\r
+\r
+> > Peace\r
+> > \r
+> > -- \r
+> > Pieter\r
+> \r
+> Tomi\r
+\r
+\r
+Peace\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Pieter\r