Re: [PATCH v7.1 00/11] Reply enhancements, second attempt
authorDavid Bremner <david@tethera.net>
Sun, 18 Mar 2012 12:59:24 +0000 (09:59 +2100)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:45:35 +0000 (09:45 -0800)
1c/218214e0e1d9ce352d2d8d10a652d0b67c689e [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/1c/218214e0e1d9ce352d2d8d10a652d0b67c689e b/1c/218214e0e1d9ce352d2d8d10a652d0b67c689e
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..70630f2
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB54D431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 05:59:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id VwskBgRSiYkc for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 18 Mar 2012 05:59:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 590D1431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 05:59:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fctnnbsc30w-142166230117.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       ([142.166.230.117] helo=zancas.localnet)\r
+       by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)\r
+       (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1S9Fhp-0006ix-Ge; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:59:33 -0300\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1S9Fhk-0007by-8l; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:59:24 -0300\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v7.1 00/11] Reply enhancements, second attempt\r
+In-Reply-To: <1331699416-30775-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+References: <1331525142-30539-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+       <1331699416-30775-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12~rc2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:59:24 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87fwd6kqtv.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Spam_bar: -\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 12:59:36 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:30:05 -0600, Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> wrote:\r
+> Hi everyone,\r
+> \r
+> This is mostly a re-send of last night's series [1]. The only changes are:\r
+> \r
+> * Fixed the emacs patch, where I had a rebase issue.\r
+> * Fixed the commit that re-added test/test-lib by accident.\r
+> * Fixed devel/schemata per Austin's review of the previous version.\r
+\r
+It looks like 04/11 doesn't apply anymore after the rest of the pending\r
+patches were applied. It looked like the patches before that didn't\r
+really make sense in isolation so I'm going to tag the whole series\r
+stale.  When you rebase, no need for "needs-review" tags.\r
+\r
+d\r