--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD49431FBC\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:58:53 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+ NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id WwqTcGoQosjv for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:58:51 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25BC2431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:58:51 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+ by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1SzsXu-0003RN-0J; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:58:46 +0100\r
+Received: from 94.196.1.178.threembb.co.uk ([94.196.1.178] helo=localhost)\r
+ by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1SzsXs-0003t1-36; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:58:45 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>,\r
+ Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: add function to toggle display of all\r
+ multipart/alternative parts\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <CAB+hUn8kVjasHkD5Wr+MiAvNS4ntVn_A7bfQ-fxuM9_Ob+QqAg@mail.gmail.com>\r
+References: <1339775751-18002-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>\r
+ <87zk80gvmb.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+ <87pq8vokmp.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+ <87ipcrvlcw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+ <87r4rf9q8x.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <877gt67q93.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+ <87wr16u3dj.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+ <CAB+hUn8kVjasHkD5Wr+MiAvNS4ntVn_A7bfQ-fxuM9_Ob+QqAg@mail.gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+96~g634443c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:58:30 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87d32yadl5.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.196.1.178\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: b447e5bbf7b2d707957f1b71744452d1 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.6\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+ determine if it is\r
+ spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+ This message scored -1.6 points.\r
+ Summary of the scoring: \r
+ * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+ * medium trust\r
+ * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+ * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+ provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+ * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay\r
+ * domain\r
+ * 0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:58:53 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+> On Aug 10, 2012 7:18 PM, "Jameson Graef Rollins" <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+> wrote:\r
+>>\r
+>> On Fri, Aug 10 2012, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+>> > How would this work together with something like [1] (rationale in [2])?\r
+>> >\r
+>> > [1] id:"\r
+> ab777cf0fa83778d3399ac52094df9230738819d.1328798471.git.jani@nikula.org"\r
+>> > [2] id:"cover.1328719309.git.jani@nikula.org"\r
+>> >\r
+>> > If you introduce a mechanism to store the state, could it be extended to\r
+>> > store the state of each individual part? That, in turn, could be used to\r
+>> > add support for expanding/collapsing each alternative part through the\r
+>> > buttons (e.g. [ text/html (not shown) ]). Each button could toggle the\r
+>> > state of the part, and refresh buffer.\r
+>>\r
+>> Hey, Jani. Are these patches needed if we have Mark's patch? I would\r
+>> prefer to see Mark's solution. Since alternative parts are supposed to\r
+>> be just that, alternative, it seems to me that a solution that would\r
+>> cycle through display of these parts is really what we want. Is there a\r
+>> strong need to show multiple alternative parts at the exact same time?\r
+>\r
+> Thanks to broken Microsoft mail clients, I get plenty of invitations that\r
+> have text/plain and text/calendar alternative parts with information\r
+> complimenting each other. I usually need to see both (luckily the included\r
+> html part I can ignore) and it's helpful if I can see them at the same\r
+> time. In a perfect world neither you or me would need any of this\r
+> functionality...\r
+>\r
+> I suppose cycling through the alternative parts is, in a sense, correct for\r
+> the reasons you state, we have the code here to do just that, and I can\r
+> always cook up something for myself. Let's go with this, then, to move\r
+> forward.\r
+\r
+Hi\r
+\r
+I am not sure I agree: I think maybe toggling parts is better. Either\r
+the parts contain the same information and then the current behaviour is\r
+probably fine, or they are not in which case we might want to see both\r
+at once\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / commitdiff