--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C53431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 18:53:19 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id zVgK3Vxk6nxu for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Thu, 6 Dec 2012 18:53:15 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+ [131.215.239.19])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979F7431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 18:53:15 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263F02E50470;\r
+ Thu, 6 Dec 2012 18:53:13 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (m70.ligo.caltech.edu [131.215.115.170])\r
+ (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+ by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8DF2E50484;\r
+ Thu, 6 Dec 2012 18:53:09 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+ id A5C82616EF; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 18:53:09 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] TODO: date range queries - check\r
+In-Reply-To: <1354833276-6219-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>\r
+References: <1354833276-6219-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+143~g175686e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 18:53:07 -0800\r
+Message-ID: <877gouine4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+ micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 02:53:19 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Thu, Dec 06 2012, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+> ---\r
+> devel/TODO | 9 ---------\r
+> 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)\r
+>\r
+> diff --git a/devel/TODO b/devel/TODO\r
+> index eb757af..277a997 100644\r
+> --- a/devel/TODO\r
+> +++ b/devel/TODO\r
+> @@ -163,15 +163,6 @@ vs. tag-when-all-files-flagged (* above)).\r
+> Add an interface to accept a "key" and a byte stream, rather than a\r
+> filename.\r
+>=20=20\r
+> -Provide a sane syntax for date ranges. First, we don't want to require\r
+> -both endpoints to be specified. For example it would be nice to be\r
+> -able to say things like "since:2009-01-1" or "until:2009-01-1" and\r
+> -have the other endpoint be implicit. Second we'd like to support\r
+> -relative specifications of time such as "since:'2 months ago'". To do\r
+> -any of this we're probably going to need to break down an write our\r
+> -own parser for the query string rather than using Xapian's QueryParser\r
+> -class.\r
+> -\r
+\r
+Has this TODO really been resolved? Do searches like "since:2009-01-1"\r
+or "until:2009-01-1" really now work? As far as I can tell they don't.\r
+Nor are they documented if they do.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQwVoTAAoJEO00zqvie6q8hGUP/0ZCxhEooAflI3XPWF++6o1A\r
+vfFifKe+YqCrplgzZpvvq0wB+0bEEYMobiiZYw1wh3b+ADiF6xdfo34/IXCnN8fY\r
+IwpPRpkITxwMUySbMOOfOPJ1hdnJyYQmZ7AVAJ1XvK4zBezDqai5DLuZc4yGuO55\r
+w0/dJ1DYEwiwdxmJi6wPsHjy6AMSjpFGJkRA8NUDJK5P77HWtYM5miCtWMO0kkVC\r
+JYz7YfWDO6sNA4s65JbjGRC5xDq8jARmuiigMNdJryGnQaCmqDyP1eBc58bAfLWC\r
+6Pogdliv5EN8q3xrZLqKSiECZ75+EmsMS6peTNQEYbKs8nsCgKLLUCaSpx6c9yko\r
+p2qW5W92l69bliQG5oQcEIdnxbpeL3xAHocDRtpUWwe9ONuan1iRQHGALL42SB8f\r
+ulwxVqwiXgeNpBGLa2dmDJ5Q2L0Pr9q9pGiqKBSPEXlaT2/NKlGYPBQ9bgDt2V1V\r
+1LjSYxwWTTfDzNKFsDdXBqLm/obnZBsRr0SmEbwe74PM8dt0cRiKLoLRBOFf7l0b\r
+5I6te36dYn0LyEwQAF7TpwpWfccNJGLT4EBg1fNRSqnuAdrZV0j4FdDFbnmQF/q3\r
++tHC8Fzpy1isqzsrClCLrdP8X3KZ0tWUwRTjzni9W6HT78feM0BASFDyJwzPCkRc\r
+ppaIc+PsNTM8u5HCLHAU\r
+=u7+R\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r