--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <schnouki@schnouki.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18718431FBD\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:01:45 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.1\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1]\r
+ autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id DTEjGFFtWA1A for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:01:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from ks3536.kimsufi.com (schnouki.net [87.98.217.222])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAAD431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:01:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from odin.local (nancy.schnouki.net [78.238.0.45])\r
+ by ks3536.kimsufi.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 470EE74000A;\r
+ Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:01:44 +0200 (CEST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=schnouki.net;\r
+ s=key-schnouki; t=1340902904;\r
+ bh=cn2kV3nRgZod9D2NWuj0N6sBYkXr0mFGWUYnodhLNeM=;\r
+ h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date;\r
+ b=hLrdEBhv69FdE86CdAowvksOtBwozWv9s1eZDSI3q9ow9spUqauFfmWQpHs7OfNPQ\r
+ 9WFz7UsjIL4Buz7ZYqM3VzWlreWjs6+3Zh2VucbeY42LKTYUO5bcXEThbpuiqcAhqn\r
+ SHLecJnR07ZW6oFS3wOdxDU2BiuZ5TQ5kr8LQIYg=\r
+From: Thomas Jost <schnouki@schnouki.net>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+ Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>, Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>,\r
+ David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,\r
+ Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all)\r
+In-Reply-To: <87fw9fwgp4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <1340815565-21083-1-git-send-email-cworth@cworth.org>\r
+ <87obo4zljq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+ <87hatwqoz9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <87ehozmpcq.fsf@jhu.edu>\r
+ <87hatv4e37.fsf@poker.hands.com>\r
+ <87fw9fwgp4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13~rc1+15~gc7c546b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.1\r
+ (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:01:37 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <8762abs74e.fsf@schnouki.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+ micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:01:45 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+Le 28 juin 2012 =C3=A0 18:21 CEST, Jameson Graef Rollins a =C3=A9crit :\r
+> On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> wrote:\r
+>> Actually, instead of either of these options, how about some way of\r
+>> letting r do the single reply, and then once inside the reply, having\r
+>> some key binding to add the rest of the recipients in the group, or flip\r
+>> between the two options so one can change one's mind after typing up the\r
+>> reply?\r
+>\r
+> This is a good idea. The other idea I had was to have 'r' query the\r
+> user directly about whether or not they want to reply all before\r
+> constructing the reply template. Or right before you're about to send.\r
+\r
+In my config, I use "r a" for "reply to all" and "r s" for "reply to\r
+sender". Never got it wrong since I added this to my .emacs.\r
+https://github.com/Schnouki/dotfiles/blob/master/emacs/init-50-mail.el#L111=\r
+-114\r
+\r
+Regards,\r
+=2D-=20\r
+Thomas/Schnouki\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP7I31AAoJEOQWxbmv9eBxfJYIAKIX9sWLBl9r/qdL3QXFkRav\r
+wW5DCqNtqicBmQH9cSJBSPtX0arp+92U8Pv2xUCFKocLwoKEacYGmZcVcNNxRwG4\r
+E+tacMRkWRt/7uaBTV9n6agXiKBRgz42qroIVZTmgxY3SRn/vvEYLzbERNyooMfS\r
+mSd3qtk2hIq5hCC1xp3oue23bLSHH9EoPJc7PqzBPAzojOR2gu29XYPW/fRf3xO6\r
+YdAuBoWGnPI5s96b2t9e+InZx6bxOHNKx8QHzi08KWWuC/JOu+MPstBfrNzCAsZ5\r
+VHUBp8Urp7sAxA9mAhrGWQz6JspXFfsepj8S1j3Gq62SyAjh6qGS2edohjwceGQ=\r
+=/1S9\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r