Re: BiDi

diff --git a/91/03361fb803c0c1014ea3b89a48dcce10912ada b/91/03361fb803c0c1014ea3b89a48dcce10912ada
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a64ca91
--- /dev/null
+++ b/91/03361fb803c0c1014ea3b89a48dcce10912ada
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+Return-Path: <clint@debian.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED1D431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  2 Feb 2012 11:05:42 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id zqMH5xoXIjA7 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu,  2 Feb 2012 11:05:40 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from cork.scru.org (cork.scru.org [209.20.67.2])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCD94431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  2 Feb 2012 11:05:40 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by cork.scru.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 6D274A00C1; Thu,  2 Feb 2012 19:05:39 +0000 (UTC)\r
+Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:05:39 +0000\r
+From: Clint Adams <clint@debian.org>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+Subject: Re: BiDi\r
+Message-ID: <20120202190539.GA1147@scru.org>\r
+Mail-Followup-To: Clint Adams <clint@debian.org>,\r
+       Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+References: <20120124200814.GA12169@scru.org>\r
+       <877h05qgew.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+In-Reply-To: <877h05qgew.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:05:43 -0000\r
+\r
+On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 09:44:07AM -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:\r
+> More info please.  What is "RTL script"?  Is that "right to left"?  If\r
+> so, yikes.  I can't even imagine what a mess that would have looked\r
+> like.  Another argument against this crazy indenting stuff we do.  I\r
+> hope the thread was also indenting from the right!\r
+\r
+Yes, right to left.\r
+\r
+Presumably this will be fixed in emacs some year;\r
+http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/SupportBiDi\r