sawsim/discussion.tex: Flesh out testing procedure

Prof. Cruz thought the existing lead in wasn't clear.

diff --git a/src/sawsim/discussion.tex b/src/sawsim/discussion.tex
index ec9d006a5fc9b1563a3344eb0a0e617c1e394357..0f0456e2b465531220dd50afe8738014c418895b 100644 (file)
--- a/src/sawsim/discussion.tex
+++ b/src/sawsim/discussion.tex
@@ -605,7 +605,16 @@ becomes difficult to convince others (or yourself) that it's actually
 working correctly.  In order to test \sawsim, I've developed a test
 suite (distributed with \sawsim) that compares simulated unfolding
 force histograms with analytical histograms for a number of situations
-where solving for the analytical histogram is possible.
+where solving for the analytical histogram is possible.  In the
+following subsection, I'll work out the theoretical unfolding force
+distribution for a number of tractable cases.  The sawsim test suite
+generates simulated unfolding curves for these tractable cases
+(e.g. single domain Bell model unfolding with a constant loading
+rate), and compares the simulated unfolding force histograms with the
+expected theoretical distribution.  The simulated histograms match the
+theoretical distributions for each combination of models regardless of
+the parameters you feed into the models, so we can be confident that
+\sawsim\ correctly implements at those models.
 
 The instantaneous likelyhood of a protein unfolding is given by
 $\deriv{F}{N_u}$, and the unfolding histogram is merely this function