Open source
single molecule
force spectroscopy

Protein unfolding in varying salt concentrations

Trevor King

Open source SMFS

  1. Proteins
  2. Atomic force microscopy
  3. Single molecule force spectroscopy
  4. Experiment control
  5. Cantilever calibration
  6. Monte Carlo unfolding simulations
  7. Unfolding in salty buffers
  8. Conclusions

Proteins: What are they?

Proteins: Where are they?

Takamori, Holt, Stenius, et al., 2006

Proteins: Titin

Adapted from Wikipedia

Proteins: Titin's I27

U. Illinois Biophysics Group

Proteins: I27

PDB structure 1TIT

Proteins: What's the problem?

MHHHHHHSSLIEV
EKPLYGVEVFVGE
TAHFEIELSEPDV
HGQWKLKGQPLTA
SPDCEIIEDGKKH
ILILHNCQLGMTG
EVSFQAANAKSAA
NLKVKEL

  →  

Pirchi, Ziv, Riven, et al., 2011

Open source SMFS

  1. Proteins
  2. Atomic force microscopy
  3. Single molecule force spectroscopy
  4. Experiment control
  5. Cantilever calibration
  6. Monte Carlo unfolding simulations
  7. Unfolding in salty buffers
  8. Conclusions

Atomic force microscopy

AFM: Cantilever geometry

Olympus TR800PSA , images from Asylum Research
We use the thinner TR400PSA

AFM: Laser deflection

Charles Roduit

AFM: Piezo positioning

The piezoelectric effect

Lead zirconium titanate (PZT) from Wikipedia

AFM: Tubular piezos

Open source SMFS

  1. Proteins
  2. Atomic force microscopy
  3. Single molecule force spectroscopy
  4. Experiment control
  5. Cantilever calibration
  6. Monte Carlo unfolding simulations
  7. Unfolding in salty buffers
  8. Conclusions

Single molecule force spectroscopy

SMFS: Sawtooth curve

SMFS: What's going on?

Carrion-Vazquez, et al., 2000; adapted from Baljon and Robbins, 1996

SMFS: Unfolding one domain

Lu and Schulten, 2000

Open source SMFS

  1. Proteins
  2. Atomic force microscopy
  3. Single molecule force spectroscopy
  4. Experiment control
  5. Cantilever calibration
  6. Monte Carlo unfolding simulations
  7. Unfolding in salty buffers
  8. Conclusions

Experiment control

Control: Quick-and-dirty

Control: Modular stack

Open source: Existing layers

Linux GNU Gentoo Python SciPy
Comedi matplotlib pymodbus Cython NumPy
h5py

Open source: Teamwork

Mlot, Tovey, and Hu, 2011

Control: Example code


class Unfolder (object):
    …
    def run(self):
        """Approach-bind-unfold-save[-plot] cycle.
        """
        ret = {}
        ret['timestamp'] = _email_utils.formatdate(localtime=True)
        ret['temperature'] = self.afm.get_temperature()
        ret['approach'] = self._approach()
        self._bind()
        ret['unfold'] = self._unfold()
        self._save(**ret)
        if _package_config['matplotlib']:
            self._plot(**ret)
        return ret
						

Archival: HDF5 and h5config

GROUP "/"
   GROUP "approach"
      …
   GROUP "config"
      GROUP "afm"
         …
      GROUP "approach"
         …
      DATASET "bind time"
      …
      GROUP "unfold"
         …
         DATASET "velocity"
   GROUP "environment"
      DATASET "temperature"
      DATASET "timestamp"
      …
   GROUP "unfold"
      DATASET "deflection"
      DATASET "frequency"
      DATASET "z"

Archival: Version control

commit 32bfbf98d79c73eba50b77d0917df100e0e33bcf
Author: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Date:   Fri Jan 18 22:54:49 2013 -0500

    afm: Optionally return stepper_approach data with `record_data`

    Sometimes these approach curves are pretty funky, so I'll start
    recording them by default in calibcant-calibrate.py.

diff --git a/pyafm/afm.py b/pyafm/afm.py
index 60741c6..e76b118 100644
--- a/pyafm/afm.py
+++ b/pyafm/afm.py
@@ -460,10 +460,11 @@ class AFM (object):
         _LOG.warn(e)
         raise e

-    def stepper_approach(self, target_deflection):
+    def stepper_approach(self, target_deflection, record_data=None):

Open source SMFS

  1. Proteins
  2. Atomic force microscopy
  3. Single molecule force spectroscopy
  4. Experiment control
  5. Cantilever calibration
  6. Monte Carlo unfolding simulations
  7. Unfolding in salty buffers
  8. Conclusions

Cantilever calibration

Calibration: Geometry

Olympus TR800PSA , images from Asylum Research
We use the thinner TR400PSA

Calibration: Equipartition

For a damped harmonic oscillator

\[ -\kappa x_c - \gamma \frac{\mathrm{d}\! x_c}{\mathrm{d}\! t} + F_\text{ext}(t) = m\frac{\mathrm{d}^2\! x}{\mathrm{d}\! t^2} \;, \]

the energy in each degree of freedom is $\frac{1}{2}k_B T$.

\[ \frac{1}{2} \kappa \left\langle x_c^2 \right\rangle = \frac{1}{2}k_B T \;, \]

where $k_B$ is Boltzmann's constant and $T$ is the temperature.

Calibration: Vibration

Calibration: Photodiode calibration

Calibration: Results

\[ \begin{aligned} T &= 298.15 \pm 0.03 \; \text{K} & \sigma_p &= 35.7 \pm 0.9 \; \text{mV/nm} \\ \left\langle V_p^2 \right\rangle &= 97 \pm 1 \; \text{mV}^2 & \sqrt{\left\langle x_c^2 \right\rangle} &= \sqrt{\frac{\left\langle V_p^2 \right\rangle}{\sigma_p^2}} = 0.28 \; \text{nm} \\ \kappa &= \frac{k_B T \sigma_p^2}{\left\langle V_p^2 \right\rangle} = 54 \pm 3 \; \text{pN/nm} \end{aligned} \]

Calibration: Stability

Quant. Units   Day 1   Day 2
$T$ K 296.30 ±0.02 294.27 ±0.02
$\sigma_p$ mV/nm  46.2 ±0.8  41.3 ±0.2
$\left\langle V_p^2 \right\rangle$ mV$^2$ 108 ±1 105 ±2
$\kappa$ pN/nm  67 ±2  66 ±2

Calibration: Inconsistency

Florin, Rief, Lehmann, et al., 1995

Open source SMFS

  1. Proteins
  2. Atomic force microscopy
  3. Single molecule force spectroscopy
  4. Experiment control
  5. Cantilever calibration
  6. Monte Carlo unfolding simulations
  7. Unfolding in salty buffers
  8. Conclusions

Monte Carlo unfolding simulations

Hooke: Experimental histograms

Sandal, Benedetti, et al., 2009

Sawsim: State model

Sawsim: Simulation loop

  1. Calculate piezo-induced gap $x_t(t)=v t$
  2. Find tension model parameters for each state
  3. Distribute per-state stretching ($x_c$, $x_u$, …) to balance the tension
  4. Calculate the transition rates between states
  5. Roll the dice to determine if transitions take place as you step forward in time

Sawsim: Monte Carlo

Sawsim: Unfolding models

Sawsim: Kramers' model

\[ \frac{1}{k_u} = \frac{1}{D} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \mathrm{d}\! x \; e^{\frac{U_F(x)}{k_B T}} \int_{-\infty}^{x} \mathrm{d}\! x' \; e^{\frac{-U_F(x')}{k_B T}} \]

Sawsim: Tension models

Sawsim: Fitting models

Open source SMFS

  1. Proteins
  2. Atomic force microscopy
  3. Single molecule force spectroscopy
  4. Experiment control
  5. Cantilever calibration
  6. Monte Carlo unfolding simulations
  7. Unfolding in salty buffers
  8. Conclusions

Unfolding in salty buffers

Lu and Schulten, 2000

Salt: Glutamic acid

Salt: Reduced stability in CaCl₂

Salt: Sawsim fits

Buffer $\Delta x$ (Å) $k_{u0}$ (s$^{-1}$)
PBS 1.32 0.222
PBS + 0.5 M CaCl₂ 1.23 0.450

Ca²⁺ radius ∼1.1 Å, H-bond ∼2 Å.

Open source SMFS

  1. Proteins
  2. Atomic force microscopy
  3. Single molecule force spectroscopy
  4. Experiment control
  5. Cantilever calibration
  6. Monte Carlo unfolding simulations
  7. Unfolding in salty buffers
  8. Conclusions

Conclusions: Salt

  • Prelimiary results show the expected destabilizing effect of CaCl₂
  • More contextual data!
    • Pulling speeds
    • Salt concentrations (physiological levels)
    • Salt species
  • Mutated proteins?
    • Is glutamic acid special?

Conclusions: Hardware

For automatic control, it would be nice to have…

  • Piezos with capacitive feedback ($10k an axis)
  • Independent 4-segment photodiode readout
  • Control over photodiode positioning
  • Control over laser alignment

Conclusions: Software

Everything works for me, and I expect it will work for others… but no software (except maybe TeX) is without bugs. Testers welcome!

THE END

Written with reveal.js