Re: gmail label support in offlineimap - update

diff --git a/02/45025252e25f6b4ea8bfad56ff06ab1b353823 b/02/45025252e25f6b4ea8bfad56ff06ab1b353823
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2a40b2a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/02/45025252e25f6b4ea8bfad56ff06ab1b353823
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+Return-Path: <gmn-notmuch@m.gmane.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2462431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:59:58 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 1.202\r
+X-Spam-Level: *\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id dLRFH4y+NWXs for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:59:58 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D640431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:59:58 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)\r
+       (envelope-from <gmn-notmuch@m.gmane.org>) id 1TdzyV-0000nT-Rp\r
+       for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:00:03 +0100\r
+Received: from arn78-1-88-186-171-7.fbx.proxad.net ([88.186.171.7])\r
+       by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))\r
+       id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:00:03 +0100\r
+Received: from R.M.Krug by arn78-1-88-186-171-7.fbx.proxad.net with local\r
+       (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:00:03 +0100\r
+X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+From: Rainer M Krug <R.M.Krug@gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: gmail label support in offlineimap - update\r
+Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:59:18 +0100\r
+Lines: 34\r
+Message-ID: <50B723E6.8000108@gmail.com>\r
+References: <50B62409.7050706@gmail.com>\r
+       <CA+eQo_0wOSjHoMK30_PwGZonBNbSDCRy+ghX-TnimfZp++8cBg@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <xa1tlidllg2v.fsf@mina86.com>\r
+Mime-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit\r
+X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org\r
+X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: arn78-1-88-186-171-7.fbx.proxad.net\r
+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0\r
+In-Reply-To: <xa1tlidllg2v.fsf@mina86.com>\r
+X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5a1pre\r
+Cc: Jeremy Nickurak <public-not-much-kexSNQTsIoD754YsiR0rpA@plane.gmane.org>,\r
+       notmuch <public-notmuch-gxuj+Tv9EO5zyzON3hdc1g@plane.gmane.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:59:59 -0000\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\r
+Hash: SHA1\r
+\r
+On 28/11/12 19:47, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:\r
+> On Wed, Nov 28 2012, Jeremy Nickurak wrote:\r
+>> The other direction sounds like it would be trickier though, since there's no obvious way to\r
+>> say "what notmuch tags have changed since time X?". Is this something that notmuch could\r
+>> provide?\r
+> \r
+> One could parse the X-Labels header and compare it with actual tags given message has.  If\r
+> there are some tags that X-Labels lists but the message does not have, the notmuch->gmail\r
+> syncing tool could assume that those were removed by notmuch.  Similarly with tags that are not\r
+> in X-Labels but the message has.  (Of course the list of tags would have to be limited to those\r
+> that have corresponding gmail labels.)  Just a thought.\r
+\r
+Assumptions are dangerous - what about labels added on gmail side?\r
+\r
+Rainer\r
+\r
+\r
+> \r
+> \r
+> \r
+> \r
+> \r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAlC3I+UACgkQoYgNqgF2egoUbACfdwBclerun3dypzmUHijh4rkn\r
+DvcAn1chRuFiy0JKuB7GjM1aMC7YOyts\r
+=vegN\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+\r