Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357866DE0B26 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 01:36:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.744 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.744 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mCgK13A9gBVW for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 01:36:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Greylist: delayed 474 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at arlo; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 01:36:49 PDT Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AAD6DE01D3 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 01:36:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [141.70.73.234]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF4C4F984; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 04:28:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8695C20156; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:28:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: Tomi Ollila , David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cli/lib: remove support for GMime 2.4 In-Reply-To: References: <1439739201-11068-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:28:44 +0200 Message-ID: <874mjygvyb.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 08:36:52 -0000 On Sun 2015-08-16 21:53:36 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > On Sun, Aug 16 2015, David Bremner wrote: > >> It's becoming a maintenance burden to do anything things with the >> crypto glue code twice, once for 2.4 and once for 2.6. I don't have >> any 2.4 version available to test on my development machine anymore, >> so the 2.4 specific code paths are likely not very well tested. >> --- >> >> I started to rebase the SMIME signature verification patches and got >> aggravated at solving the same conflicts twice in every file. >> >> 2.6.7 is from 2012, so that's a bit newer than some of our >> requirements, but I think not so bad. YMMV. > > Perhaps it is time for me to update to gmime 2.6 in this machine. PITA ;/ Please do, i think gmime 2.4 is really not well-supported upstream any more either. --dkg