Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F46431FBF
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 May 2014 20:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.799
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id FYmvMTHigSd3 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Thu,  8 May 2014 20:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yh0-f41.google.com (mail-yh0-f41.google.com
	[209.85.213.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 403D9431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 May 2014 20:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yh0-f41.google.com with SMTP id f73so3221501yha.14
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 08 May 2014 20:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=2i2QAez35jwzdLByxYWszMXwkVa0iD9+wx/tZfHefuk=;
	b=wypzZOX4lg4V8nxmWd08qaWSZBxko6idcxNdIyUS3mcXFCFqQ1w36nOvpqtcNtLzs+
	ydoZbJsOUh+NHJjeQ2D55QLq0tl5A02qPiOIjaIJR/gfzsmGbl8of3o53ODGqjZhdY2c
	TGyMDu6W4qChlV+MLpScO8xG/IBxb2JsDuRps1nPNJQ7qltty+CND/CayjhsyPds/uKP
	mi0YqsJs3+yjAc72cHZygS+mCYr1F8aeiappMzb1jkoyUvi8DLRXmfhDSYzadxFNaLfZ
	RI8pX3GhSSNeMSo4Y2L7Pq9JIm4e5zZd0RpYSQyWsYT7Hku0uhDq9OG+l6HGhclQ7xrQ
	BGmw==
X-Received: by 10.236.149.38 with SMTP id w26mr11096678yhj.51.1399605572643;
	Thu, 08 May 2014 20:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (189-211-224-40.static.axtel.net. [189.211.224.40])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s26sm4360567yhg.4.2014.05.08.20.19.30
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Thu, 08 May 2014 20:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 22:08:42 -0500
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>, 
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <536c46baeab11_211cea530860@nysa.notmuch>
In-Reply-To: <20140509030156.GY28634@odin.tremily.us>
References:
 <CA+kKtKAw=nEn2dfcvF6++gD5ng+S3T8SLAdVL=Hs=EsvwUg6aw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87iopgkaiz.fsf@nikula.org> <E1WiJsj-0004mz-VK@teckel.deptj.eu>
	<20140508101325.GC23124@vilya.m0g.net>
	<CA+kKtKA8Q5z6Pys9RAumLTiJvmGwWYKGXDkKr9Mh_6ecV-7sdA@mail.gmail.com>
	<874n0zvqrx.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
	<CA+kKtKBSP0RYRy6GgEWcqTsAm_CzkN7zJfkjfwAgq8HqoyU+WQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140508234945.GW28634@odin.tremily.us>
	<536c40b5e5333_741a161d310e2@nysa.notmuch>
	<20140509030156.GY28634@odin.tremily.us>
Subject: Re: Github?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 03:19:40 -0000

W. Trevor King wrote:
> Agreed.  The only problem I'd have is that you'd want to say that the
> GitHub repo was a mirror, since the primary repo would still be
> git://notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch.  If it's a mirror, I think it
> should mirror all refs on the main repo [1] without adding new ones.

I disagree. There's absolutely zero chance of a problem adding a
'travis-ci' branch, which adds a single file, which would conflict with
upstream in anyway.

-- 
Felipe Contreras