Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA356DE0C42 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 02:33:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.004 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1LDc8YKLOdm9 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 02:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wp251.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp251.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.133.20]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEB866DE0948 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 02:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dslb-088-069-220-164.088.069.pools.vodafone-ip.de ([88.69.220.164] helo=localhost); authenticated by wp251.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1Z3hoY-0002C2-St; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 11:33:22 +0200 Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 11:33:22 +0200 From: Robert =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=FCnnemann?= To: Jani Nikula Subject: Re: Syntactic sugar for range syntax Message-ID: <20150613093322.GA28382@peachum> References: <20150610153833.GA19301@peachum.local> <87h9qejgyz.fsf@nikula.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87h9qejgyz.fsf@nikula.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;robert@kunnemann.de;1434188008;10e5c876; Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 09:33:31 -0000 Hi! Thanks for your response! On 11/06, Jani Nikula wrote: >> date:today-1week..today >In other words, date:1w.. >The reference for relative dates is "now" if one is not specified. >The minus sign means nothing, relative dates all refer to the past >and are added together. That's good enough for my purposes. The man page could be a bit clearer on that, I'll try to send a patch later. With kind regards, Robert Künnemann