DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=J6DNnCbzQAzFyInBX36Lctnsu4TmZDV5ykGcEmaPypMwHBCcL6PRxm88mYqjWWPJQu
	jRhOejX6DvkJaPJMo37dxrgGrQ7RhbiMN6RPmaLFO6OdHvnU120++YCfPdITJdO9AXAe
	UP5BZAQB9haCS8XL3NpGKvXEvzfmTZryy9p3A=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87y6eogkge.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
References: <87zkz4xnf4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
	<874ohctf2h.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>
	<87sk4wxm7j.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
	<87wru8rze2.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>
	<87hblcxksa.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
	<87y6eogkge.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:07:56 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTik0Cde6RpCS0UqwEYu2PHZ5X09VWA5bRspnRHKO@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove message archiving from show-advance-and-archive
From: "servilio@gmail.com" <servilio@gmail.com>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Precedence: list

On 9 June 2010 13:54, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
[...]
> But I have seen enough people complain about it that I've been convinced
> that something is wrong about it. I'm not yet sure what the right answer
> is. But if we at least have separate commands for separate actions, then
> hopefully it wouldn't be too difficult for users to combine those
> actions.
>
> When we have one command that does several different things, then it's
> much harder for users to tweak.
>
> I suppose one option here would be a customizable variable that controls
> what happens when trying to advance "past" the last message, (do
> nothing, advance to next thread, archive current thread and advance to
> next thread)?

Or hooks. If that is not possible, I prefer small functions I can
combine when personalizing the key bindings.

Servilio