Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E252429E21 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:27:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.99 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DS8DUY2x1s4j; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C6B431FB6; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A58BB2543F1; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:27:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: Xavier Maillard , Michael Radziej , Florian Friesdorf , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages In-Reply-To: References: <8739ll8dkv.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net> <87mxjphl55.fsf@spieleck.de> <87wrirtn58.fsf@spieleck.de> <87tydutuhk.fsf@spieleck.de> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:27:26 -0700 Message-ID: <87tydm3wlt.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:27:34 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > My goal is to use notmuch remotely directly on my IMAP server but there > are problems when doing notmuch new in the dovecot tree (dovecot index > files if I recall correctly). Can you describe what the specific problems are here? It would be great to fix notmuch to work well in this scenario. Perhaps we would simply need a list of filename patterns to ignore? =2DCarl =2D-=20 carl.d.worth@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFNtdku6JDdNq8qSWgRAk7YAJsEfUWFQs3B3sUJqJdcLz2hEc+FAQCgogxK WoShP/wqwI/9eEQcngifYCs= =VsMO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--