Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F396DE1A7C for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 13:37:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.129 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.129 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.551, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.103, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.01, T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uEybvFnonyo9 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 13:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qg0-f46.google.com (mail-qg0-f46.google.com [209.85.192.46]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714626DE138F for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 13:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qgfa63 with SMTP id a63so64067695qgf.0 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date :message-id:to:mime-version; bh=ZtpAbHRiZ89cQ0Qzh0dCMNw8K5lg+JksPouXbT/TmYc=; b=F6CTARUInyfROIwIB6u7whdCpMAPpZNW0q3Gmu/yuhjSJDf/2zX5+L43vTOrw0Z4L2 ciLCD+PjokkwGoQABQtPcKTp+ZHormGFCtY9PzLR1jekDuoldxXrCMhaqFxILfwEvJb8 GP2YJo0wesZRAg2URUvnsUWhtFICP/aZA+NlboygMhHr4sylJKRPkA5pgXDwUvewYT/3 /CEe45o9XA1joiY8LSoJcdHlN/PAT6kNqRay53YhiAC8NuOXF3pWd2NJnXK8hPiayfy+ 9Hf8G9+lHX9jL/eVonABa1vjq5EfM4jE3JZlpFYIqAjaKdhT1rfLCOcaWR504X/TnWit MOkw== X-Received: by 10.140.231.85 with SMTP id b82mr33220873qhc.2.1433277450261; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.46.105.6] ([70.42.157.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 9sm7873282qhy.1.2015.06.02.13.37.25 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:37:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Nathan Eagleson From: Nate Eagleson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: build failure on Mac OS X 10.6.8 - diagnosis Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 08:46:53 -0400 Message-Id: To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 20:37:34 -0000 Hi folks, I'm trying to move from Apple's Mail.app in favor of = offlineimap/notmuch, but I've run into a notmuch build failure on Mac OS X 10.6.8. The failure was reported on this list a few months ago, but no = explanation or solution was found: http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2015/020531.html By appending `-Wl,-t` to `FINAL_NOTMUCH_LDFLAGS` in Makefile.local, I got 10.6.8's ld to dump the list of archives and dylibs that are being linked in the failed compile. That list includes `/usr/lib/libutil.dylib`, but not notmuch's built-in `util/libutil.a`. I have not found a sane way to tell 10.6.8's ld to prefer libutil.a over libutil.dylib. My first thought was that there should be an option to prefer archives = over dylibs, but that does not seem to exist in 10.6.8's (or earlier) version = of ld. Instead, people are recommending absolute paths when you need to link an archive file in preference to existing dylibs: = http://lists.apple.com/archives/darwin-development/2003/Sep/msg00008.html http://stackoverflow.com/questions/844819/how-to-static-link-on-os-x As a simple test, I added a hardcoded absolute path to libutil to FINAL_NOTMUCH_LDFLAGS, and the compile succeeded. Thus, it seems like getting the path to the Makefile's parent directory = and using it to specify an absolute path to libutil.a in the Makefile would = address this issue without introducing new ones. Does this sound like a sane solution? Would a patch to do this be = accepted? If not, what would be a better way to solve this? Thanks. -Nate