Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1251A431FBD for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 08:26:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F6OI3rUsabkn for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 08:26:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.17]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694E7431FB6 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 08:26:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from omta22.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.73]) by qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id b3qX1n0031ap0As5A4Sd3F; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 16:26:37 +0000 Received: from odin.tremily.us ([24.18.63.50]) by omta22.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id b4Sb1n00Q152l3L3i4Sc38; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 16:26:36 +0000 Received: by odin.tremily.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 046D6106C13B; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 08:26:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tremily.us; s=odin; t=1394295994; bh=nmXB2/JbhnASZIqNIrx31WEBxQcF10q7oRBIS+yChb8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=n+ZRmQqgRk7A65jn3K1LAkbpBI6uh6o1eA9RGI+cb/3a9lixCI1F97c9VAoOvIbMB dfQgRp26vuLNKh6sOTD3utORWHzWA9KibZqiwwVyXSM8xmKHEIMQHKcZ6DQyuvR0K3 P8AnN72M+SNjV3obivGyzQdFtyv4S6MCea9hDJl8= Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 08:26:33 -0800 From: "W. Trevor King" To: David Bremner Subject: Re: [PATCH] nmbug: Add 'clone' and replace FETCH_HEAD with @{upstream} Message-ID: <20140308162633.GM16433@odin.tremily.us> References: <80db13662a0313711ca3a91e338a63d35e64a83c.1391898002.git.wking@tremily.us> <87siqsrhch.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dp9QYJgVRVEW2bsm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87siqsrhch.fsf@zancas.localnet> OpenPGP: id=39A2F3FA2AB17E5D8764F388FC29BDCDF15F5BE8; url=http://tremily.us/pubkey.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1394295997; bh=NqZRVi0pfJjp+0Bs8qtPjbOVzrMEm97OajCLGjXRrZ4=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BD8cdWuqViy+zrKveEYieurl9KmBfymSqVw1tbE7OhYMdw5HO47CYyGnsgCwmr9Ek blcwXbjgEzG891fG5IhN3ArOEH3Vp7PCVg1m+pqkR/ymeJ75Ce0UIBou4ne/nXpeO6 pxMeeQvyHK3vJ11wqc74LEbxIczipRhgntuKmtZKaJwyYHugqYteMjO8gGoXLG8ANq UZYgc3TN9s8mrsMWT/RW/+1DrXUU9KcvQ/uiLImJu1JupigBiXHUDhHLuS+YB/FLVF qA6LGHBHQV29rK/8kk9YIS7kiFFvCa+uLGC53oxsy3Xyf/D1xW/QI/AYdORfjVHs73 Usc88vgM9LjZA== Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 16:26:41 -0000 --dp9QYJgVRVEW2bsm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 08:43:26AM -0400, David Bremner wrote: > W. Trevor King writes: > > +sub do_clone { > > + my $repository =3D shift; > > + system ('git', 'clone', '--bare', $repository, $NMBGIT) =3D=3D 0 > > + or die "'git clone' exited with nonzero value\n"; > > + my $branch =3D git ('symbolic-ref', 'HEAD'); > > + $branch =3D~ s|^refs/heads/||; > > + git ('config', 'remote.origin.fetch', '+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/or= igin/*'); > > + git ('config', "branch.$branch.remote", 'origin'); > > + git ('config', "branch.$branch.merge", 'refs/heads/$branch'); > > + do_fetch(); Oops, it looks like I used a tab instead of two spaces to indent do_fetch. I'll fix that in v2. > > +} >=20 > I think doing a fetch immediately after a clone deserves a comment. I commented in the commit message. Basically everything from =E2=80=9COne tricky bit is that bare repositories don't set upstream tracking branches by default=E2=80=9D down through =E2=80=9Cgives us the master-bran= ch commit.=E2=80=9D is describing what's going on here, and why I made these changes. On the other hand, perhaps this is too many hoops to jump through to get upstreams without a working directory. As an alternative approach, we could drop --bare and use --no-checkout on the clone. That would also let us avoid the bare-recovery config adjustments and follow-up fetch. With do_clone reduced to just wrapping the 'git clone' command, we could remove it and just recommend folks run: $ git clone --no-checkout http://nmbug.tethera.net/git/nmbug-tags.git ~/.= nmbug That's going to create ~/.nmbug/.git though, if we want to preserve the current bare-style ~/.nmbug/ layout, we'd need something like: $ TEMPDIR=3D$(mktemp -d) $ git clone --no-checkout --separate-git-dir=3D~/.nmbug \ > http://nmbug.tethera.net/git/nmbug-tags.git "${TEMPDIR}/nmbug" $ rm -rf "${TEMPDIR}" If we go the --separate-git-dir route, I think we're better off hiding that in Perl ;). Of the three approaches: 1. git clone --bare =E2=80=A6, tweak configs, and git fetch 2. git clone --nocheckout =E2=80=A6 3. git clone --nocheckout --separate-git-dir =E2=80=A6 I prefer the third, but I'm happy with any of them. > > @@ -473,7 +487,7 @@ sub diff_index { > > sub diff_refs { > > my $filter =3D shift; > > my $ref1 =3D shift || 'HEAD'; > > - my $ref2 =3D shift || 'FETCH_HEAD'; > > + my $ref2 =3D shift || '@{upstream}'; >=20 > I wonder about hard-coding '@{upstream}' in several places. What do > you think about a global "constant"? OF course it was hard-coded > FETCH_HEAD before, but I think not in quite as many places. In the three non-comment places where I've hard-coded it, it's just a default in the case that the caller left that argument empty. In the two comment places where I've hard-coded it, one is just mentioning that it is the default, and the other is giving it as a useful example. I don't think that calls for another layer of indirection. Cheers, Trevor --=20 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy --dp9QYJgVRVEW2bsm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTG0S3AAoJEKKfehoaNkbt4bYP/3vMIr+4d7pfdJzyfuz5Ezcp jiWeY6PD/O5XDIBxu4FfxsW7czMO/PZ1Om334M6VgmeE24Xl/y+a6FMf2f6FcQ7z /8g1vhzQJBo8iqcBJ72LPH+97suNK72tywEWt9Mzvyjwk5kl/ngn+zeD3fwCrBKD /4Z+cy42p84TkD69QJefOCAWeStHWIzJPFPPwxworY9rOigADklhoVsoZU55J1EM ySFsSW72N8wsf65qbjnuhwihOG9Hs6fcpHiqvgssEKwpEqtyvCO9Ide4YcqMfd17 9i/iA4VqDaSEfFZqd4Yx3g192MCvft7g8AVQJw5VTWr9oodos2NYHeaNYdmPh+Y5 gGqF/3YRPjXzFMyySljYjDO08jZrKMUHESAJ1SMbzDALnLgIA0+KMYkZBza7o05q /dkYpfBF1h4Zuj7cTHU/Cg/LmqpPtQiP4EPRkGa2Y7NnLcEb8jfdlHqpNx/PmFfG q3HAILQsJnGTg2I4s9wDRFuKIvEQL8uI0Ygl8LLS85wWN7f2nagNs9MExQs7otrs MFcAvN6m8SztBqAWRZ/ZkUx3LphQfhRy3qrnpHeT6wJQLfhXl7qhyTceadFBDvGQ Q8/tWV3q7tMtuwIQE7J9YtX2DbcQeT9Vf/NnaK2H0EMrSvr5eLNbvppe4WigqZ4P EXDgc9+5HWv1/35EFe4L =GZ0q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dp9QYJgVRVEW2bsm--