Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0C1431FAF for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 03:29:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s4NX0UHkDiZN for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 03:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C32431FAE for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 03:29:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id E136D10009D; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:29:27 +0200 (EET) From: Tomi Ollila To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: out of tree build fixes In-Reply-To: <1395276484-22363-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> References: <1395276484-22363-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+155~g3416ef5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:29:44 -0000 On Thu, Mar 20 2014, David Bremner wrote: > Apparently we've neglected the out of tree builds even more than > usual. I originally thought this is what was causing the test failures > on buildbot. I'm less sure now, but I think these fixes don't hurt > anything, and they do unbreak out of tree builds for me. > > There is certainly still work to be done with our out of tree builds. > For those of you just joining the party, that doesn't mean we want to > switch to your favourite build system. Or even to Autotools. > > An earlier draft of this series (discussed on IRC) defined a builddir > variable, but eventually I realized the current directory of make is > always builddir. So at least for now that doesn't seem to be needed. LGTM. Too bad we cannot expand $(dir) in recipes (or I don't know how), and using other variables don't bring any benefit (naming would contain the 'doc' part and we even cannot check whether the variable is defined or not...). > > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch