Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:28:55 -0500
From: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] emacs: remove some code duplication in notmuch-show
Message-ID: <20111128182855.GB2050@mit.edu>
References: <1322259811-10834-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
	<87lir0xr3g.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87lir0xr3g.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list

Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Nov 28 at  6:24 am:
> On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 02:23:30 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > -(defun notmuch-show-get-header (header)
> > +(defun notmuch-show-get-header (header &optional props)
> >    "Return the named header of the current message, if any."
> > -  (plist-get (notmuch-show-get-prop :headers) header))
> > +  (plist-get (notmuch-show-get-prop :headers props) header))
> 
> Hey, Dmitry.  It looks like the new plist-get call is assuming props is
> defined, but it looks like it's only optional in the argument list.
> Wouldn't the function fail if the props argument is not supplied?

If props isn't provided, it'll be nil, so notmuch-show-get-prop will
also interpret its optional props argument as not being provided.