Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46784196F0 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 06:20:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TzFYjnD79XlP for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 06:20:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F507431FC1 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 06:20:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4]) by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA88119F3337; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 15:20:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1]) by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new, port 10044) with ESMTP id SBkYlsg7x+V7; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 15:20:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34]) by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525EB19F3347; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 15:20:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from steelpick.2x.cz (k335-30.felk.cvut.cz [147.32.86.30]) (Authenticated sender: sojkam1) by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41FF915C062; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 15:20:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wsh by steelpick.2x.cz with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Nzrep-0005CM-Hu; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:20:31 +0200 From: Michal Sojka To: micah anderson , Sebastian Spaeth , Notmuch development list Subject: Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests In-Reply-To: <87d3yb6dyh.fsf@algae.riseup.net> References: <87iq9gi0z8.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87hbo3vlrn.fsf@algae.riseup.net> <87bpe9qr5f.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87d3yb6dyh.fsf@algae.riseup.net> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:20:31 +0200 Message-ID: <878w8y6py8.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:20:36 -0000 On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, micah anderson wrote: > On 2010-03-27, micah anderson wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson wrote: > > > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > > > > > > > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > > > > would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each > > > > contains 1 or 2 patches. They have all been based on todays > > > > cworth/master, so it should be really painless. > > > > > > Thanks for pulling these all together! All the ones that you propose I > > > also use and would really like these to be merged as well. > > > > > > The only other patch that I find absolutely crucial, that you do not > > > include, is the 'Preserve folder information when indexing' patch which, > > > although not perfect, does significantly change my life. > > > > Glad you find it useful. Yes, having the folder information would indeed > > be nice. Is that patch working well for you? (Can you point me to the > > mail ID of the patch you are using? There have been several versions > > around). > > The patch works really well for me. I also had difficulty figuring out > which was the latest. I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz, but it is not rebased to the current master. I do not use this patch right now, since I didn't find time to apply it on top of my mailstore abstraction patches. What I remember from when I used it is, that it was really problematic with mail sent by me to mailing lists. There were two version of the message - one in sent folder and one in list folder - and the "folder tag" was not assigned deterministically. I think that now I know how to implement this correctly, I only need some time. Also, the problem is very similar to synchronization of maildir flags to multiple files, which is what I'm solving right now. So probably, after I finish maildir flag synchronization I can work on this patch. -Michal