Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4002B431FAF for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 05:48:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EeRuorNBiSLV for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 05:48:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACA7F431FAE for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 05:48:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnrLr-0002RC-RF; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 09:48:56 -0400 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TnrLm-0000QS-7N; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 09:48:50 -0400 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] parse_tag_line: use enum for return value. In-Reply-To: <1356464567-21779-2-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> References: <1356464567-21779-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <1356464567-21779-2-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+213~g4af1ac6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 09:48:50 -0400 Message-ID: <87obhgrkjh.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam_bar: - X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:48:57 -0000 david@tethera.net writes: > From: David Bremner > > This is essentially cosmetic, since success=0 is promised by > the comments in tag-utils.h. Pushed this one patch. Both of the two I pushed from this series are really nothing to do with batch tagging, and were just cluttering things up. d