Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC00431FB6 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:42:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jP1R5Opfbv1M for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:42:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98168431FAF for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:42:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sgt4d-0004GL-Gd; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:42:06 +0100 Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sgt4d-0003YO-8t; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:42:03 +0100 From: Mark Walters To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] emacs: new mua mailto: URI handler In-Reply-To: <1334438868-17168-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> References: <1327865624-7673-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <1334438868-17168-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+63~g548a9bf (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:42:01 +0100 Message-ID: <8762an4uk6.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: 3d25b672e9098124a0da1b3a6427e7b9 (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored -1.8 points. Summary of the scoring: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay * domain * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:42:12 -0000 On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > The new function 'notmuch-mua-mailto' provides an interactive handler > for rfc6068 "mailto:" URIs. It attempts to implement the rfc6068 > specification: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6068 > > More decoding of the mailto string needs to be done, as is evident by > the fact that the mailto test remains broken. > --- > Rebased against current master. Hi I have just been playing with this and it seems to work well. Indeed, I have not come across any "real" links that it fails on. (All the links on http://www.mailto.co.uk/ seem to work for example.) What is your experience? If it only fails on contrived examples then I am much happier about including it. I only had one comment on the lisp: > + (notmuch-mua-mail to subject other-headers) If you make this (notmuch-mua-mail to subject other-headers nil (notmuch-mua-get-switch-function)) it respects the users preference on where to open the new message. Best wishes Mark