Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FBF431FD0 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:18:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L5ryHu272LTZ for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDFA431FB6 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FC42E50DAD; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:13:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-98-149-172-122.socal.res.rr.com [98.149.172.122]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98CE2E510E9; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:13:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by servo.finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A61571303; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:18:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: Florian Friesdorf , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: address completion when composing In-Reply-To: <87d3jph107.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net> References: <87fwolh1mu.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net> <87d3jph107.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:18:43 -0700 Message-ID: <87oc39i2a4.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:18:52 -0000 --=-=-= On Wed, 11 May 2011 14:31:36 +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > In addition, about a year ago, Sebastian indicated, that notmuch itself > could offer returning email addresses [3]. Are there arguments against > or just nobody found the time to do it? As with pretty much everything in notmuch, manpower time is probably the issue. I think that if you wanted to get this working that would be great. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNysT0AAoJEO00zqvie6q8cXgQAJqqpjiQ8sUCcAIasgzN2qQK 3W6nPRdrP3gzxAxpv+wAgjAatjxUe/ypZERedFmer7WwQaftQYkIBQai5Ra2uLz+ qkWcQrLLIdYOTs8y2oDQnLf5OJRIbvaGQTWbJiSWZscqyRfR2Uz0xRn6cmC4R0bZ BNIXOk06W1attkXLbYG/IwgYJw6MPbtNBtPUifdL1jhMBVdTUbw9Hkx8BzcrufG7 2g+6jJiiJFsjLOukqIrzwg7g37PNxgP4cTFgxu7FcgDOyYlRBzwbQvChrn9TXNOs pes1HuUNG/jspn5vJ8ouadEuzX7YezqVWNhkrqCgr5iUZj2WM+joytvqPCDZiTNK y324a9SZL9nEgKrXHINrljzi6anW+7H3iQbZ0QRnQxN9/ZsB/kk74MIzYuphXol3 f4oGeUX4m14rCfYiI1FjQ+BM5HKalAn/vHkj8c9TIuiIRkuG8r7tMve4MUKlUXst /0yWEi4f5zwPXc/GYK+ECu7bebw0JwjXlLEz0JYGL7FzbvgzdkjhZfPhI1HdIKPE arx5JREwjKVSsLagLBqSQU6f09IbYmk2HHS4YuOtR7yQ/wVI5tOvXc4uMgdnLPVI HXWudpeEj8V3LfrM156ONX367eed25FDERAI1IkWT0sMtYBU53Iy6lIY1VXGRYXk +Dp7m5lWFuEkitqi+phb =9u8X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--